- The Washington Times - Saturday, October 9, 2004

Goodbye, Expos

This week, as your article “Expos bid adieu with loss” (Sports, Monday) noted, we in Montreal watched our Expos play their last game as a Montreal team. The losing score was 8-1 against the Mets at Shea Stadium.

The feelings are mixed. Like a bad mother whose children are taken away and sent to a foster home, there is guilt, jealousy and hope. I must confess that in my 22 years of life in this city, I have headed to the “Big O,” as we call the stadium around here, only once to watch an Expos game — and that was thanks to the free tickets my dad got at work.

The game I attended was earlier this year against the Phillies. We arrived after the game started and left before it ended. My friend fell asleep during the game, and I paid more attention to wackiness in the crowd of 3,000 than the game itself. I marveled at the tens of thousands of empty seats.

I’ve always had a soft corner in my heart for the Expos, yet it never translated into anything concrete. Sure, I wish them the best. Sometimes I’d tune into games on the radio, but I never bothered spending any money on the Expos — not on games or memorabilia. I never donned an Expos shirt or cap.

I must also admit that I’m jealous. My Expos — if I can call them that — are being taken away by Washington. Even though I never really did anything for them, they were still the Montreal Expos and I am a Montrealer. Nobody likes seeing their possessions, no matter how neglected, taken away.

Yet at the same time, I’m hopeful. I admit that we didn’t give the Expos the care and attention they deserved, and in some ways, I’m happy that Washington is willing to take them in. I hope Washington treats my Expos well.

The Expos can’t be accused of being indifferent to the low attendance. The marketing department did all it could under the circumstances to draw in more fans, but we didn’t respond. Nobody wanted to spend a beautiful summer evening watching a mediocre team in a concrete dump under a huge orange or blue canopy.

We love to cry over the 1994 semiseason. The Expos were the team that could but were held back by the strike. It was our one chance that wasn’t meant to be. The one that spelled doom for our team.

I’d like to hand over my Expos with some sincere advice: Please give our Expos a nice home. Had we been able to take the team out of its slum and give it a new home downtown, I might not be writing this today. Be careful who becomes custodian of the team. We’ve had some really terrible experiences with owners. The one that makes our blood boil is Jeffrey Loria, the man who paraded into town as the savior, yet ran away with all he and his staff could get away with (literally).

Please show all the support you can. Apart from the few tears we shed as the pop fly was caught to end the Expos’ last game in Montreal, we have neglected the team for a very long time. It’s about time it got some love and compassion from someone. There isn’t much we can do now. Some of us still think “anything is possible” and are hoping that this is another false alarm like the ones in previous years. Yet, for most of us, reality is sinking in. It was inevitable. Years of mismanagement and neglect, together with bad luck and a horrible venue, don’t make for a pleasant mix.

Much of the city is still trying to imagine a spring with no opening day at Olympic Stadium. A huge crowd (by our standards) of 30,000 to 40,000 would make its way to the stadium, only to have a meager 8,000 or so at the next game. Similarly, a large number of us would show up for the last homestand of the season, just in case it was to be the last season. Our relationship with the Expos was focused on the first date and the last date. Unfortunately, that kind of relationship doesn’t last for too long. As for that used Expos vs. Phillies ticket still sitting on my desk, maybe I’ll give it a shot on eBay 40 years from now.


Vaudreuil-Dorion, Quebec

Subsidizing the rich, Democrat-style

As you quote him, Rep. Rahm Emanuel, Illinois Democrat, is “surprised the White House hasn’t boasted about the Expos’ move from Montreal. … After all, they’ll finally be creating some jobs here in America” (“Trading Dubya,” Inside the Beltway, Nation, Thursday).

Well, Mr. Emanuel, the deal was made by the Democrats in the D.C. government, not President Bush. Therefore, there are several reasons why the White House will not boast about this deal. First, this president gives credit where credit is due. You must be confusing him with a previous president, who claimed credit for a booming economy and successful welfare reform that others made happen.

Second, word is that many landowners in Anacostia will have their land taken for the building of a stadium for the team. This is typical Democratic disregard for the property rights of Americans. Because local taxes will finance the building of the stadium, the Democrats have orchestrated another transfer of wealth from the poor of Washington to a few rich baseball owners.

No, let Mayor Anthony A. Williams and the other Democrats in the District do the boasting. In typical fashion, the Democrats have created another program that subsidizes the rich.



Tobacco responsibility

Bob Barr says he favors personal responsibility, but then he attacks one way of making people responsible (“Bad precedent on tobacco,” Commentary, Oct. 3). As he mentions, the tobacco companies just pass any litigation costs to their customers, so the users are the ones who will pay for the sins of the industry. Is that fair? I think so. Thousands of smokers are running up medical bills that all of us help pay.

Instead of taxing tobacco products more to offset the costs to society for treating smoking- and chewing-tobacco-caused diseases, Congress — of which Mr. Barr was a part — failed to raise taxes. So the states sued the industry, and the settlement payments help offset the costs paid out by the Medicaid departments.

You will note that I say “help.” All the taxes and all the settlement monies usually don’t come close to paying for the treatment of tobacco-caused diseases, accidents and fires. In Georgia, Mr. Barr’s home state, Medicaid spends more than $419 million every year treating tobacco-caused diseases of people who can’t afford to pay for their own health care. Before last year’s increase tripled the cigarette tax from 12 cents a pack to 37 cents, the tax brought in only about $80 million a year, a far cry from $419 million.

Mr. Barr loves to talk about personal responsibility, but he doesn’t follow through when it comes to tobacco. It appears he doesn’t care if nonsmokers have money taken out of their pockets to pay for the tobacco users’ medical bills.



Georgians Against Smoking Pollution

East Point, Ga.

Elections in Kashmir: Why not?

I was relieved to read that, finally, nuclear-armed rivals India and Pakistan are holding serious talks to resolve the Kashmir matter — a confrontation that could lead those neighbors to war as it has in the past. Only this time the death toll would be much higher (“Living less dangerously in Pakistan, India,” Editorial, Sunday).

I applaud both sides’ peace initiatives, but here is an idea: Why don’t both countries hold an open, and fair, ad hoc election and let the affected people decide their fate?

At least let the Kashmiris decide who their leaders will be. Why not let international monitors see what the people really want? An open society is the only way to solve this conflict.


Gainesville, Fla.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide