- The Washington Times - Saturday, September 25, 2004

Some 2,300 years ago, the Greek philosopher Aristotle observed it’s “an easy matter” to give away money. “But to decide to whom to give it, and how large, and when, and for what purpose” is not so easy, the wise man said.

Many senior citizens will eventually face this uneasy matter. According to a recent study by the Boston College Social Welfare Research Institute, some $41 trillion or more “will be transferred via estates” during the first half of the current century. An estimated $6 trillion will go to charity, the Boston College researchers estimated.

Some of the money will change hands in large amounts. For example, when Joan Kroc, the late widow of McDonald’s hamburger tycoon Ray Kroc, died last October, she left more than $1.5 billion to the Salvation Army and hundreds of millions more to other charities. But most bequests will go unnoticed, partly because they will involve much smaller sums of money and because some benefactors wish to remain anonymous.

In fact, bequests are just part of the picture. Last year, for example, corporations, foundations and individuals donated an estimated $240.7 billion to nonprofit organizations in America, the Giving USA Foundation reported in June. So “charity” is big business in America.

But charity also faces a potential crisis. The crisis revolves around a central question: If you give money for a specific purpose, is the charity obligated to use it for that purpose?

To most people, the answer would seem like a “no-brainer”: Of course, charities have such an obligation. If they don’t want to use a gift as a donor intends, they can simply return it.

But such moral clarity increasingly is lacking in our society.

For example, in 1961, the late Charles and Marie Robertson donated $35 million in A&P; stock to establish a charitable foundation. The foundation’s sole mission was “to establish and maintain and support” at Princeton University’s graduate Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, “where men and women dedicated to public service may prepare themselves for careers in government service, with particular emphasis on… international relations and affairs.”

Thanks to wise investment decisions and growth in the economy, the original gift’s value has increased dramatically.

Though Princeton has spent some $300 million of the Robertson Foundation money over the last 43 years, the endowment is still worth nearly $600 million, reports say.

But the issue isn’t the money; it’s how the money is used.

According to a lawsuit filed by Mr. and Mrs. Robertson’s son and daughters, Princeton has diverted more than $100 million of the foundation money into projects, salaries and other expenses with little or nothing to do with the foundation’s mission — while, by and large, ignoring the purpose of the gift. Indeed, while Robertson Foundation funds have provided full tuition and stipends to more than 1,700 students, they say, fewer than 12 percent of the program’s graduates have gone on to appropriate government service.

Today’s senior citizens fought fascism in World War II and communism in Korea and during the Cold War. They understand the importance of public service and sacrifice. They recognize the difference between right and wrong. And they can appreciate why Charles and Marie Robertson, just months after President Kennedy called on Americans to “ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country,” would make such a gift to support public service. Princeton would appear to have done a great injustice — not only to the Robertsons, but to the American people.

There is clearly a principle involved here. When we give money to a charitable organizations for a specific purpose, that’s how the money should be used. If the Robertson children are correct, Princeton alumni should be ashamed of their alma mater. In the meantime, senior citizens who contemplate gifts or bequests need to exercise caution.

Learn everything you can about a charity’s programs, operations and finances before giving money. Give only to organizations that will use your dollars for purposes you support. And make sure the a donee endorses the “Donor Bill of Rights,” an ethics code developed by several major fund-raising organizations and endorsed by many nonprofits.

James Martin is president of the 60 Plus Association, a national senior citizens’ organization.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide