- The Washington Times - Friday, September 3, 2004

BEIRUT — Lebanon’s Parliament voted overwhelmingly yesterday to extend pro-Syrian President Emile Lahoud’s term, ignoring U.N. calls to hold an election to choose the head of state.

The amendment to the constitution, secured after Lahoud supporters mustered more than the two-thirds of votes needed, had been expected. Neighboring Syria, the main power broker in Lebanon, backed Mr. Lahoud’s bid to extend his six-year term, which was due to expire Nov. 24.

Ninety-six of the 125 lawmakers who attended the 21/2-hour session raised their hands to support the amendment, while the remaining 29 legislators voted against it. The bill was declared adopted by Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri.

Late Thursday, a deeply divided U.N. Security Council narrowly approved a resolution aimed at pressuring Lebanon to reject a second term for Mr. Lahoud and calling for an immediate withdrawal of all foreign forces in Lebanon — an indirect reference to Syrian troops.

The United States and France had pushed for the resolution, which was aimed at pressuring Syria to loosen its grip on Lebanese politics.

But Lebanon’s lawmakers pressed ahead, affirming their loyalty to Syria by backing Mr. Lahoud, Damascus’ close ally.

Legislator Mohammed Raad, leader of the nine-member Hezbollah bloc, the Lebanese guerrilla group the United States lists as a terrorist organization, said the vote was “to support Lahoud and to reject the policies of the American administration in the region.”

Before the vote, opponents slammed the process and criticized Syrian interference.

“I reject the proposed amendment. It has been proven to us that the extension decision had been taken in Syria and by the Syrian regime,” presidential candidate Butros Harb told the legislature.

Another lawmaker, former first lady Nayla Moawwad, called the amendment a “scandal” that put Lebanon and Syria in a confrontation with the United Nations. “This is a sad scene and a black day in the history of Lebanon,” she said.

Thursday’s Security Council resolution was adopted with the minimum nine “yes” votes. For it to pass, the United States and France had to drop a threat “to consider additional measures” if the resolution wasn’t implemented and drop a direct reference to Syrian troops.

Syria sent its troops into Lebanon in 1976 to help quell a year-old civil war that raged for 14 more years. The troops remain and Lebanon’s government repeatedly says their presence is a stabilizing factor since the civil war ended in 1990.

Foreign Minister Jean Obeid said yesterday that the U.N. resolution was “out of place,” but Lebanon will work with the world body and other countries to “right the course and confront the results” of the resolution.

Last week, Lebanon’s Cabinet approved the constitutional amendment.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide