- The Washington Times - Thursday, September 30, 2004

COLUMBUS, Ohio — Savvy thieves are using the Internet and finding loopholes in the law to steal identities from the living and the dead, a problem becoming increasingly pervasive despite efforts to stop it.In one case that could be likened for sheer audacity to stealing a bank safe in broad daylight, someone requested copies of 4,577 birth certificates from an Ohio office whose employees, by law, had to provide the documents despite their suspicions.

“It wasn’t for personal use; I can guarantee that,” said Mark Kassouf, chief fraud officer for the Ohio Department of Health. “They were looking at those to find ideal candidates for identity theft.”

Ohio and about 15 other open-records states face a dilemma involving birth and death records. State officials say they have closed some loopholes in the law that can leave residents vulnerable to identity theft or the country vulnerable to terrorism. But they and federal authorities also say the document fraud problem is growing.

Meanwhile, adoptee and genealogy groups are pushing for more access to birth and death indexes, the records thieves use to request documents in someone else’s name.

In law enforcement circles, those documents are called breeder documents, because criminals use them to breed a financial clone of an identity theft victim or proof of citizenship.

Government-document fraud played a part in 17,192 cases of identity theft reported in 2003, up 4,246 cases from the previous year, according to the Federal Trade Commission, which tracks identity theft. Overall, the fraud accounted for 8 percent of the almost 215,000 cases of identity theft reported by consumers last year.

The FTC said its numbers may understate the problem because consumers often don’t know how fraud against them was committed.

Attorney General John Ashcroft said recently that identity theft costs the U.S. economy an estimated $50 billion a year.

The documents dilemma is complicated by the fact that vital statistics records are kept in a decentralized system at state and local levels. States try to close loopholes by using security paper, seals and applications for access, but getting hundreds of records registrars to comply with those steps is another matter, said Richard McCoy, director of public health statistics for Vermont.

His state has almost 250 town clerks who can issue copies of certificates. About a dozen of them don’t use security paper because it is more expensive than plain paper, Mr. McCoy said. State law doesn’t require security paper.

“That is frustrating because it does open us up to fraud issues,” Mr. McCoy added.

Judith Collins, director of the Identity Theft University-Business Partnership at Michigan State University’s School of Criminal Justice, said the tools for breeder-document fraud are readily available to thieves. Miss Collins and her staff track identity theft online, train law-enforcement officers and assess theft risks for businesses.

As part of their research, her staff printed a 31/2-inch-thick binder of thousands of names and Social Security numbers from the Internet.

“Identities are out there,” Miss Collins said. “Data is going to be increasingly kept in databases. The answer is to secure the borders of those businesses who have the databases, to ensure the people working in their business are honest.”

Keeping vital statistics in electronic databases is a priority for the National Association for Public Health Statistics and Information Systems in Silver Spring, said its executive director, Kenneth Beam. But, he added, those databases should be for government eyes only.

Mr. Beam said national databases would help prevent breeder-document fraud by allowing government employees to check the validity of other states’ documents against the electronic records.

A recently published report by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, which investigated the September 11 terrorist attacks, recommended such a federal system for issuing birth certificates.

At last count in 2002, Mr. Beam’s statistics association knew of 14 open-records states, he said.

In the summer, Ohio increased copying fees for certificates and required an application and that all state offices use the same security paper and seals.

In 2002, California limited access by requiring that the state registrar produce separate birth and death indexes for public view that didn’t list Social Security numbers or other sensitive information. The legislation’s sponsor showed Senate colleagues that she could go to a genealogy Web site and find her mother’s maiden name — a common identifier at banks.

In similar fashion, Texas removed its indexes from the state’s Web site last year, citing fraud concerns.

Nonetheless, the problem isn’t going away. Ohio still is told by the regional New Orleans Passport Agency and the Department of Homeland Security that its documents are part of a large fraud problem, Mr. Kassouf said. He said he expects to see a problem with death certificates, which in Ohio list Social Security numbers.

As fraud concerns lead the remaining open-records states to restrict access, adoptee organizations are pushing for the opposite, said Adam Pertman, executive director of the Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute in New York, a national nonprofit dedicated to improving adoption policy.

He said people who could prove they were adoptees should have access to indexes because they often can’t get what they seek from just one birth or death record.

Jack Brissee, chairman of the vital records, access and preservation committee of the National Genealogical Society, said genealogists need access as well.

“We’re hurting because of concerns about identity theft, which we don’t engage in,” he said. “The type of information we need isn’t contributing to identity theft.”

But open access to that information can lead to identity theft and aid terrorists by helping them secure U.S. passports, said Stuart Patt, spokesman for the State Department’s Bureau of Consular Affairs. All but one of the September 11 hijackers had some form of U.S. identification, the September 11 commission report said. Some of those documents were obtained through fraud.

“The biggest concern is that someone who is trying to conceal his true identity and his true nationality would suddenly have what is essentially the best proof of American citizenship,” Mr. Patt said.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide