- The Washington Times - Saturday, September 4, 2004

The Republican National Convention in New York City was a swell show. There were some fine speeches and pleasant political pageantry inside Madison Square Garden. Outside, we were treated to occasional glimpses of the New Left anarchist freak show. There were some warm moments when a radiant Laura talked about her husband, and the twins, Jenna and Barbara, made us laugh at their Dad.

Vice President Dick Cheney, in his calm and competent way, outlined the administration’s defense of America. And President Bush, though not the smoothest talker, proved once again he is a chronically optimistic Texan with a strong faith in God and the people of his country — and has a resolute commitment to stand up for both.

That was all well and good — but it was all so, well?consistent, so expected, so predictable. There was no real excitement.

Now, I know my Republican friends tried to be stimulating. But was anyone really surprised when Ed Koch, the former Democratic mayor of New York City, castigated his party and its candidate for their flaccid stand on combating terrorism and endorsed George Bush for president? Was anyone stunned when fiery Georgia Democratic Sen. Zell Miller rebuked his party’s standard-bearer by saying, “Nothing makes this Marine madder than when someone calls our troops ‘occupiers’ rather than liberators”? Was anyone startled that after Maryland’s black lieutenant governor, Michael Steele, called on people of color to vote Republican, the so-called mainstream media debased his effort by pointing out that “96 percent of Republican delegates are white”? Of course not. All this was so very predictable and unexciting.

For those of us who crave thrills with our politics, there is only one place to turn: the Kerry campaign. The Republicans offered a recitation of policies they have consistently used to cut taxes, create jobs, improve education, bolster homeownership and protect the homeland. Then they talked about personal responsibility, private compassion and plans to bring U.S. troops home from places where they are not needed so we’re better prepared to defend the American people.

But for sheer excitement, there’s nothing like the Kerry campaign.

Having launched his convention with a double-barreled blast about how heroic he was in Vietnam, Mr. Kerry quickly decided he didn’t want to talk about a war that ended 29 years ago after fellow veterans cited “inconsistencies” in his story. He doesn’t want to talk about his multiple trips to Paris to meet with communist leaders during the Vietnam War. Now, with former POWs saying in TV ads Mr. Kerry’s “antiwar” rhetoric was used by Hanoi to increase their suffering, the Democrat candidate is really excited about changing the subject.

In an effort to do so, Mr. Kerry broke the gentleman’s tradition of not campaigning during an opponent’s convention and went to Nashville to address the annual meeting of the American Legion. Exciting people always break traditions. They are called iconoclasts. While he was before my fellow Legionnaires, Mr. Kerry said, “The first definition of patriotism … is keeping faith with those who wore the uniform of the United States.”

Whoops. For most politicians, talk about “patriotism” and “keeping faith” would be fairly benign — maybe even boring. But not from Mr. Kerry; for it immediately makes veterans — particularly the 2.5 million of us who served in Vietnam — recall how patriotic he was when he accused us of committing atrocities and war crimes during sworn testimony April 22, 1971. Several Legionnaires were so moved by his patriotism they got up and walked out.

Not content to let it go at that, Mr. Kerry tried the faithful bit again by noting “How hard we fought after we returned from service to keep faith with our fellow soldiers.” That statement was certainly exciting to Paul Galanti, one of Mr. Kerry’s fellow naval officers who was tortured in Hanoi. The former POW describes Mr. Kerry’s “faithfulness”: “He dishonored his country and … the people he served with. He just sold them out.”

Still striving for excitement, Mr. Kerry claimed as commander in chief, “I would’ve made sure that every soldier put in harm’s way had the equipment and body armor they needed.” That was pretty stimulating to veterans who remembered Mr. Kerry voted against the $87 billion appropriations package that included money for more body armor. Some of those present suggested that for real excitement, Mr. Kerry might like to visit the troops in Iraq.

And just to make sure he had touched all the hot buttons he could, Mr. Kerry promised, if elected, he will deliver better housing, better medical care, better insurance, better education, better retirement, better disability pay.

That was pretty stirring to vets who recall his 1995 vote against $4.3 billion and his 1996 vote against $4.1 billion for military family housing; and his 2003 vote to deny Defense Health Program benefits to National Guardsmen and against increasing combat pay and family separation allowances.

What makes the Kerry campaign so exhilarating is trying to keep up with all his different stands on all the different issues. His positions on Iraq have more ups and downs, more twists and turns than a roller-coaster. In fact, it has become so thrilling to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, that she told voters in Nevada last week she “can’t understand” Mr. Kerry’s Iraq position.

And then there’s the Senate’s leading Democrat — he has had all the excitement he can handle. Tom Daschle is now running TV ads in South Dakota showing him embracing that boring, steady Texan — George W. Bush.

Oliver North is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide