- The Washington Times - Thursday, April 7, 2005

In his latest wholly inadequate performance, Kofi Annan claimed he had been “exonerated” by the latest report on the latest U.N. scandal, the $64 billion Oil-for-Food swindle.

Back in the real world, which begins as soon as you leave the Tower of Babel on the East River, the report found His Excellency failed to investigate U.N. conflicts of interest and in general badly managed the whole Oil-for-Food scandal.

As this investigation notes, the U.N. secretary-general showed a remarkable incuriosity about where all the money went. Much of it seems to have ended up in the pockets of go-betweens like his own son Kojo and the U.N. official he picked to run the program — Benon Sevan, whom the investigation found had a “grave conflict of interest.”

While claiming exoneration, Mr. Annan said he would take note of the report’s criticism of his actions, or rather inaction. Sound familiar? This is the same discreet tack he took after his indifference to the genocide in Rwanda was revealed.

For a sense of the horrors Kofi Annan has presided over, it’s hard to beat the movie “Hotel Rwanda.” There should be continuous showings of it on a big screen behind the rostrum whenever he rises to give one of his long, platitudinous speeches about world peace, so no one is misled. His real policy in times of moral crisis? Wash his hands of responsibility.

Kofi Annan’s infamous instruction to the commander of the U.N. peacekeeping force in Rwanda, Lt. Gen. Romeo Dallaire, who wanted to prevent the massacres, remains a classic example of carefully nuanced neutrality between good and evil:

“You should make every effort not to compromise your impartiality or to act beyond your mandate but may exercise your discretion to do so should this be essential for the evacuation of foreign nationals.” As for the natives, who cares?

If a 19th-century imperial power had shown such a fine disregard for the lives, property and welfare of its colonial subjects, it would have earned the obloquy of enlightened opinion. But when the United Nations and its secretary-general do the same, they are defended by all right-thinking members of the left. It’s an ingrained reflex by now.

When his role in Rwanda came to light, Kofi Annan would say only “I believed at that time that I was doing my best.” Even worse, that may have been the case. Just as he did his best in the Balkans, where he presided over the massacre at Srebrenica with supreme indifference. His best remains bloody awful, as this latest investigation reveals.

Exonerated? To quote Mark Pieth, a member of the independent commission assigned to investigate this monumental scandal: “We did not exonerate Kofi Annan. We said he was not dishonest, but at the same time he mismanaged the inquiry. … We should not brush this off. A certain mea culpa would have been appropriate.”

Instead, Kofi Annan has been brushing off the commission’s criticisms like mad. If this report were an exoneration, you have to wonder what an expose would look like.

Considering the dearth of any real U.N. influence, its secretary-general can’t do too much harm beyond giving aid and comfort to the world’s Saddam Husseins while they commit their crimes.

But think of what the United Nations might have been under better management. The great tragedy isn’t the evil the United Nations condones but the good it fails to do.

Imagine a United Nations that stood up for freedom instead of betraying it at every turn. Imagine a world in which all that Oil-for-Food money had actually gone for food — instead of billions siphoned off by Saddam and his accomplices.

Imagine a world in which international help for tsunami-stricken survivors in places like Banda Aceh would be delivered in less than the month the U.N. took to act. The U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines were on the case in days, maybe hours.

But as long as Kofi Annan heads the United Nations, such a better world is hard to imagine.

No, all the U.N.’s various problems will not be solved by finding the U.N. a new secretary-general. But it would be a good start.

Paul Greenberg is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide