- The Washington Times - Tuesday, August 2, 2005

The 1.4 million members of the United Food and Commercial Workers have now joined the 1.8 million members of the Service Employees International Union and the 1.4 million Teamsters in disaffiliating themselves from the AFL-CIO. If, as expected, the 450,000 members of UNITE HERE, which represents hotel, restaurant and textile workers, bolt the labor federation, then the AFL-CIO will have lost more than five million, or nearly 40 percent, of its 13 million members.

That’s not the way the AFL-CIO planned on celebrating the 50th anniversary of the 1955 merger between the American Federation of Labor and the Congress of Industrial Organizations, which at the time collectively represented about 35 percent of nation’s private-sector workforce. Today, only 12.5 percent of the total U.S. workforce is unionized, and fewer than eight in 100 private-sector workers carry a union card. But it is the price exacted by the losers in the federation’s recent power struggle.

Ten years ago, the labor movement was also fractured. Then, however, the dissidents were able to muster a majority in the AFL-CIO. Led by then-SEIU President John Sweeney and Gerald McEntee, the longtime president of AFSCME, the dissidents succeeded in ousting AFL-CIO President Lane Kirkland and eventually capturing control of the AFL-CIO. Today, unable to secure the support of a majority, the dissidents, who were led by Andrew Stern (Mr. Sweeney’s successor at SEIU), could not defeat Mr. Sweeney’s bid for re-election at the convention. So they bolted.

Publicly, the defectors complained that Mr. Sweeney spent too few dollars on organizing activities (as if there were a shortage of union funds available for organizing), while becoming too attached to the Democratic Party. “We absolutely believe the AFL-CIO has become too much in the back pocket of the Democrats,” SEIU political director Anna Burger hilariously told the Wall Street Journal recently.

In fact, as the recent House vote on CAFTA clearly demonstrated, it is the Democratic Party that is in the back pocket of organized labor. (Compared to 40 percent of House Democrats who voted for the NAFTA in 1993, fewer than 8 percent of the Democratic caucus voted last month for CAFTA.) The dissidents’ newly formed, service-oriented Change to Win Coalition, which is as protectionist as the industrial unions of the AFL-CIO, is already threatening to exact revenge upon the few Democrats in Republican-leaning districts who voted for CAFTA.

More than any other union, the SEIU has bought and paid for the Democratic Party. The SEIU gave more than 99 percent of its $9 million in soft-money contributions (1999-02) to the Democratic Party, and SEIU President Stern has acknowledged spending at least $65 million trying to elect Democrats in 2004. Also, just weeks before the Iowa caucuses, the SEIU joined AFSCME in endorsing Howard Dean, the ultra-liberal Democrat who is now chairman of the Democratic National Committee.

While not as large, the political expenditures in recent years by the Teamsters and the food and commercial workers have been comparably apportioned in favor of Democrats, who responded to their paymasters by voting overwhelmingly against CAFTA.

LOAD COMMENTS ()

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide