- The Washington Times - Sunday, December 18, 2005

Back in the 1960s, there was not much of a conservative movement in America, and the idea of reducing the size of the federal government was seen as a ridiculous fantasy. Much has changed since then: Conservatives boast decisive power in both houses of Congress, they count the president as one of their own, and they have vigorous champions throughout the news media. But reducing the federal government is still seen as a ridiculous fantasy.

The Republicans who now dominate Washington bring to mind Ann Darrow, the blonde heroine of the movie “King Kong.” At first, she finds the enormous creature repulsive and terrifying, but once she gets to know him, she finds he’s not so bad. Big government struck them as a thoroughly pernicious phenomenon when controlled by liberal Democrats. Once it became their tool and their toy, they had a change of heart.

The latest congressional actions make it painfully obvious Republicans no longer have the least desire to diminish the size, cost or power of the central government. Last month, amid great self-congratulation, the House voted to eliminate $50 billion in entitlement spending. That sounds impressive until you consider that this year, Washington will spend some $2.6 trillion; these savings would be spread gently over five years.

For that matter, this plan doesn’t actually cut total federal outlays. It merely reduces the annual rate of growth in entitlement spending from 5.4 to 5.2 percent.

Just because the people in charge like spending tax dollars, however, doesn’t mean they like collecting them. They prefer giving voters goodies without insisting they pay for them. Last week, the House approved tax cuts worth $95 billion over the next five years — nearly double the spending cuts. So, under the best scenario, the deficit will grow and the government will continue to borrow enormous sums.

That has been the pattern under President Bush, who has done much to squander the budget surplus he inherited. Thanks in large part to his tax cuts, federal receipts plunged in his first term. Some conservatives still entertain the idea tax cuts pay for themselves. In inflation-adjusted terms, though, revenues are the lowest since 1998.

But tax cuts were supposed to have another positive effect. For years, conservatives have said they would yield a smaller government, by “starving the beast.” Allow Congress less money, they reasoned, and it would have to spend less.

If that were so, big government would be pretty emaciated by now. Instead, the beast looks more like a product of the obesity epidemic. Since the GOP won control of the House of Representatives in 1994, federal outlays have grown by nearly a third, after accounting for inflation.

As Cato Institute budget analyst Chris Edwards notes in his new book, “Downsizing the Federal Government,” Republicans have learned shoveling out dollars is much more fun than pinching pennies. In the 1995-96 session of Congress, for every bill introduced to reduce outlays, there were two bills to increase outlays. By 2003-04, the imbalance was positively grotesque — with 24 spending bills for every bill to cut spending.

Republicans deserved much of the credit for the surpluses of the 1990s, which came about because they forced President Clinton to agree to balance the budget. Regrettably, that achievement turned out to be as fleeting as a Florida snowfall. In real terms, the deficit is bigger now than when they started.

Rhetoric aside, most Republicans in Washington secretly share the sentiment of former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, Texas Republican who in September said there was nothing left in the budget to cut because “after 11 years of Republican majority, we’ve pared it down pretty good.” Mr. Edwards came up with more than 100 programs that could be reduced or eliminated, from farm subsidies to the National Endowment for the Arts to Social Security, saving $380 billion a year.

Those cuts would not be politically easy. They might be politically possible, though, if Americans understood they are the only way to put the nation on a sound fiscal footing, avoid huge future tax increases and spare our children an immense burden of debt. Republicans may no longer worry about such matters, but someone should.

Steve Chapman is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2020 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide