- The Washington Times - Thursday, December 29, 2005

In a season of holiday cheer and giving, congressional conferees have come up with a Grinch-style lump of coal for Americans who don’t have a lot of political clout.

While much of the public was more captivated by successful Senate efforts to save the caribou in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge from oil drilling, Vice President Dick Cheney cast the tie-breaking vote on a budget that would trim federal spending, mostly from popular social programs.

Senate Republican leaders were puffed up with pride over the trims they managed to impose for the first time in eight years on the growth of such programs as Medicare, Medicaid and student loans. Their ostensible purpose was to cut the deficit, which returned with a growing vengeance in the Bush years.

But that savings probably will vanish like a drop in a barrel of red ink in the wake of President Bush’s tax cuts, the most recent of which awards $70 billion in capital-gains tax cuts for mostly upper-income earners and investors.

The new Senate-passed budget cuts $39.7 billion during the next five years, during which the Office of Management and Budget estimates total federal spending will exceed $13 trillion — that’s “trillion” with a “t” and an “r.”

Thank Republican moderates for blocking spending cuts that conservative House members had pushed to offset the $60 billion in hurricane Katrina-related spending aid the Congress pledged in the fall. Unfortunately, the resulting bill does less to reduce the deficit than to shift its burden to poor and middle-class folks who, for example, need help paying for a nursing home or putting their kids through college.

Yes, the biggest savings, $12.7 billion over five years, come from student loan programs. It would fix interest rates on student loans at 6.8 percent, effective July 1. The rate will be fixed, not adjustable, even if commercial rates are lower.

Since student loan rates now stand at 5.375 percent, students who are thinking about consolidating their student loans to lock in a low rate for the life of their loans are strongly advised to consolidate immediately.

Note to young folks: Consider this your political payback for not voting in greater numbers.

Not that older folks got much more respect in this newly proposed budget’s priorities. Out-of-pocket costs for the poor people who rely on Medicare, a federal-state health program, would go up by way of increased copayments and premiums for a net five-year savings of an estimated $6.4 billion.

States also will be allowed to scale back some Medicaid benefits, while tightening eligibility for Medicaid nursing home reimbursement. Net five-year savings: $4.8 billion.

Student loans and Medicaid nursing home reimbursements have become a major help to middle-class families. Student loans are a true investment in enterprising students and the future of our economy. Nursing home aid has become a last-ditch help to many middle-class families. Yet, at a time of rising costs, Congress has put the budget-cutting knife to these very worthwhile and popular programs as if they fostered laziness.

Democrats pushed through enough small changes to force the Senate’s bill back to the House for yet another vote before it can be sent to President Bush for signing into law. The House is expected to pass it with little substantive change.

Still, the delay offers a slim but important chance for the public and for principled lawmakers of both parties to take a hard look at what this 774-page budget offers — and what it takes away.

Clarence Page is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2020 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide