- The Washington Times - Tuesday, February 1, 2005

ASSOCIATED PRESS

The White House defended Homeland Security Secretary-designee Michael Chertoff yesterday, saying the former Justice Department official did not advise the CIA on using specific torture techniques on terror suspects.

Judge Chertoff, who goes before lawmakers today for confirmation hearings, didn’t approve any interrogation techniques, White House spokesman Scott McClellan said. Judge Chertoff simply told intelligence officials that interrogators should know the line between which techniques they are allowed to use and which they aren’t and “not get close to that line,” Mr. McClellan said.

“Any assertion that he approved or preauthorized or otherwise approved the use of certain techniques is simply false,” Mr. McClellan said. “That wouldn’t have been appropriate for him to do as head of the Criminal Division.”

The Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel — not the Criminal Division — would have been responsible for interpreting the law, Mr. McClellan said.

Judge Chertoff is expected to win confirmation easily after his hearing today, although Democrats said they plan to question him about his role in advising the CIA about torture standards.

Meeting with Republican and Democratic staff members Monday, Judge Chertoff said any legal advice he gave the CIA was broad and generalized — and merely from the viewpoint of “what a prosecutor would look for,” one aide said.

The Capitol Hill meeting, which lasted several hours, was described as cordial. Several aides who spoke on the condition of anonymity said Judge Chertoff grew slightly exasperated after repeated questioning over whether he had any role in approving techniques that critics said violated the Geneva Conventions prohibiting violence, torture and humiliating treatment.

Judge Chertoff is a former federal prosecutor who is now a federal appeals court judge in Newark, N.J. He was chief of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division when he was asked for guidance on whether CIA agents could be charged for using specific interrogatory techniques on terror suspects. Judge Chertoff repeatedly told aides he gave only basic and generalized advice as “how a prosecutor would approach the statute.”

“He said that’s something he said consistently to anyone and everyone that’s asked,” said an aide who attended the meeting.

The meeting came as the American Civil Liberties Union urged lawmakers to press Judge Chertoff during today’s hearing in front of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on the extent he helped craft and supported several other controversial anti-terror policies.

Although the group said Judge Chertoff “has an accomplished record as a jurist and attorney,” it charged him with supporting “national security policies that push, or breach, the outer limits of what is permissible under the Bill of Rights.”

The ACLU specifically focused on policies allowing the detention of hundreds of Arab and Muslim men for minor immigration violations during the September 11 investigations, and on the USA Patriot Act, which gives the government broad surveillance and law-enforcement powers in terror cases.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide