- The Washington Times - Sunday, January 30, 2005

OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) — Nip, tuck and … tax?

Lawmakers trying to plump up the bottom line are considering a “vanity tax” on cosmetic surgery and Botox injections in Washington, Illinois and other states, but plastic surgeons and their patients say the idea is just plain ugly.

“It makes no sense. Where does it stop — massages, facials, teeth cleanings?” asked Karen Wakefield, 51, who has had a nose job, dermabrasion, liposuction, tummy tuck and breast lift — plus a little Botox here and there.

“Even having a baby is elective surgery,” added Miss Wakefield, an event planner in Woodinville. “Why not tax that, too?”

The Washington state senator who proposed the tax said she has never gone under the knife for beauty, but wouldn’t rule it out.

“I, too, look in the mirror and see my mother,” said Seattle Democrat Sen. Karen Keiser. But she thinks cosmetic surgery patients can afford the state’s 6.5 percent sales tax. She wants to earmark the money for poor children’s health insurance.

“We could do Botox-for-babies parties. It might be the new thing,” Mrs. Keiser said. “Anyone who can afford the money for cosmetic procedures, I don’t think they would be deterred by a little sales tax. You pay it on your lipstick.”

The tax would not apply to reconstructive surgery for, say, burn victims or women who have undergone mastectomies.

In September, New Jersey became the first and so far the only state to tax plastic surgery, at 6 percent. The tax is projected to bring in $25 million per year. In Illinois, the state comptroller has proposed a 6 percent tax on cosmetic surgery to create a stem-cell research institute. If the legislature approves, the question could be put to the voters in 2006.

In California, the capital of cosmetic surgery, such procedures are tax-free.

The cosmetic surgery tax is a cousin to the “sin taxes” many states slap on drinking, smoking and gambling during tough budget times.

“In this anti-tax climate, these user-based selective tax proposals are more palatable than broader ones,” said Bert Waisanen, tax policy analyst for the National Conference of State Legislatures.

The American Society of Plastic Surgeons frowns on this new wrinkle, calling New Jersey’s law a “dangerous precedent.”

Seattle surgeon Dr. Phil Haeck noted that 86 percent of cosmetic surgery patients are women.

“This is an unfair tax on women,” said Dr. Haeck, editor of Plastic Surgery News. “The bulk of the people who have procedures are not financially upper-class women.”

Miss Wakefield, for one, wants people to know she paid for her own nips and tucks.

“I’m not married to some rich guy,” she said. “I worked my butt off for this.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide