- The Washington Times - Saturday, June 4, 2005

The more Europe changes, the more divided it remains. First the French rejected the proposed European constitution and encyclopedia (it was almost 500 pages long) by a decisive 55-45 percent vote. The Dutch did the same within days — by an even greater margin. The outcome should not have surprised: Any constitution with 448 articles was bound to collapse of its own weight.

Who could tell what was in that fine print? It was impossible to know just what the voters were asked to endorse, especially after the Continent’s political class “explained” it.

Europe’s politicians and pundits were all a-twitter over the results, or rather nonresults, of these elections, but it’s hard to see what all the fuss was about. A little perspective, please:

By now the French have gone through a revolution that ended in a dictatorship, five republics, three monarchies, a couple of empires, an occupation or two, a fascist puppet state, assorted reigns of terror and numerous constitutional revisions and rejections. (Did I skip anything?)

After all those twists and turns, it’s hard to think of a democratic vote against a flimsy product of the eurocracy in Brussels as a… CRISIS. But a Continent that produced opera isn’t much given to understatement.

The politicians and pundits may be crying alarm, but the Europeans refuse to be alarmed. Relieved might be a better description of the popular mood. Or even elated, if the postelection rallies of the opposition were an indication. This time the people showed up their elite, instead of their elite showing them how to vote. It must have felt good, for there are few elites more elitist than the French variety. It’s not just at the United Nations that French leadership is insufferable.

Remember Dominique de Villepin, the diplomat with all the airs of the self-published “poet” he is? He’s to be the next French premier, capping his inconsequential careers at both the Foreign and Interior Ministries. How perfectly French. The man is the very image of refined futility. Nothing seems to succeed in France like … nothing.

Much of the postelection analysis seems all about how the extremes of left and right united against the European Union’s proposed constitution. But it may not have been so simple. The center also seems to have rejected it.

In France, not just the fearful old but the defiant young seem to have rebelled against their elite’s instructions. While the Socialist Party’s hierarchy campaigned for the constitution, one report had 56 percent of its rank-and-file voting against. The gap between Europe’s people and pols is unmistakable.

In case anyone missed the point, the Dutch delivered the coup de grace to a constitution that, for all practical purposes, was already dead.

Europe remains as it has been: divided. Anti-Americanism and anti-Semitism can hold a Continent together only so long.

It’s been clear for some time what Old Europe is against, but what’s it for? All the rhetoric about the desire for a new all-European identity keeps running into the same old European reality: Nobody’s heart beats quicker at the sight of the EU’s flag of 12 gold stars circling on a blue field, not the way Brits are stirred by the Union Jack or Frenchmen by the “Marseillaise.” The European Union is no union. How could it be with 20 official languages?

The moral of the story: A constitution does not a people make. It usually works the other way around. Americans were Americans long before we were formally united by a constitution, and its aim, lest we forget, was to create a more perfect Union.

But even if Europeans do eventually adopt some kind of free-trade agreement gussied up as a constitution, complete with an anthem and a foreign minister in name, they will still remain respectively French, Dutch, German, Italian, British, et European al. Divided they stand, or rather slouch.

Paul Greenberg is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide