- The Washington Times - Thursday, March 17, 2005

On Oct. 19, 1960, Martin Luther King and 52 others were arrested in Rich’s Department Store in Atlanta for refusing to leave a table in its Magnolia Room restaurant. On Monday, Oct. 24, the 52 “sit-ins” were released.

But King was sentenced to four months at hard labor and sent to Reidsville State Prison. His pregnant wife, Coretta, was terrified King would never leave that rural prison alive.

Told of the situation, John F. Kennedy placed a call to Mrs. King, and Robert Kennedy telephoned the judge who had ordered King to Reidsville. The next day, King was released on bail.

Relief in the black community, especially in the South, was immense. King’s father, a renowned Baptist preacher who had come out for Richard Nixon on religious grounds, now endorsed Kennedy. “Because this man was willing to wipe the tears from my daughter’s eyes,” said the senior King, “I’ve got a suitcase full of votes, and I’m going to take them to Mr. Kennedy and dump them in his lap.” Writes Theodore H. White, chronicler of presidential campaigns,”Scores of Negro leaders, deeply Protestant but even more deeply impressed by Kennedy’s action, followed suit.”

Black pastors told the story from pulpits. Outside their churches, pamphlets describing the episode were distributed in the millions on the Sunday before the election. The shift of the black vote to Kennedy probably decided the election of 1960.

Yet, had King, which assuredly he did, told his congregation that Sunday what the Kennedys had done and what he proposed to do — take a “suitcase full of votes” to the Democratic nominee — his Ebenezer Baptist Church should have, under IRS. law, lost its tax exemption. As should have every church in the South whose pastor endorsed Kennedy from the pulpit that Sunday.

That is the absurdity in the IRS tax code that Rep. Walter Jones of North Carolina has set about to abolish.

Under The Houses of Worship Free Speech Restoration Act of 2005, the IRS code would be amended to permit priests, pastors and rabbis to express their “personal views on political matters or elections for public office during regular religious services, so long as these views are not disseminated beyond the members and guests assembled together at the service.”

Sunday services at black churches where candidates like Bill Clinton and John Kerry are embraced by preachers and pastors would be legal under U.S. law. But, so, too, would sermons from the pulpit by Catholic priests and Christian pastors who told congregations that abortion is the slaughter of the innocent, that homosexual marriage is an abomination, and they should vote for the candidate, be it George Bush, who will oppose them.

What are we doing muzzling our religious leaders, who, like the prophets of old, have been ordained by God to hold rulers to account?

America was founded by men and women who sought religious freedom. The Bill of Rights begins with a command: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech.”

How in such a land can we permit federal agents of the IRS to monitor speech in churches and punish priests or pastors or rabbis who speak truth to power by telling their congregations that some men and women are standing up for morality, while others are not. What kind of country have we become, when men and women who take vows to God thereby lose their rights?

The power to tax is the power to destroy. How did the power to destroy churches whose preachers tell their congregations the truth as they see it — that some politicians are advancing God’s Kingdom, while others are violating God’s commandments — end up in the hands of the IRS? Because LBJ put it there.

He had not intended, too, but in 1954, an election year, LBJ was bedeviled by tax-exempt groups who were pointing out the alleged Communist connections of some Texas liberals. LBJ had inserted in the IRS code a penalty loss of tax exemption for any organization whose leaders endorsed or opposed the election of a politician. His amendment was not intended for churches, but it bound them just the same.

Separation of church and state means churches do not dictate state policy and the state does not dictate church teaching. It does not mean rulers have immunity from condemnation or praise.

As Bishop Michael Sheridan of Colorado Springs argues, Catholic priests have a duty to declare “moral principles, including those pertaining to the social order, and to make judgments on human affairs to the extent that they are required by the fundamental rights of the human person or the salvation of souls.” If Congress cannot get free the houses of God, the obstructionists, whoever they are, should get a hiding — from every pulpit in America.

Patrick J. Buchanan served in the Nixon, Ford and Reagan administrations.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide