- The Washington Times - Friday, March 25, 2005

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — The cross, a symbol of Christianity that sits atop church steeples, dangles from necks and hangs on walls, is now ending up in the mouths of the faithful, over the objections of some religious officials.

A mass-produced chocolate cross is being sold this Easter by Russell Stover Candies Inc. in about 5,000 stores nationwide, which experts say is apparently a first for a major American company.

“Obviously they’ve seen that there’s a market for chocolate crosses at Easter,” said Lisbeth Echeandia, a consultant for Candy Information Service, which monitors candy industry trends. “I don’t see it growing tremendously but I think there would be growth in the Christian market.”

However, not all Christians are happy about it. Chomping on a chocolate cross can be offensive to some, said Joseph McAleer, a spokesman for the Roman Catholic diocese in Bridgeport, Conn.

“The cross should be venerated, not eaten, nor tossed casually in an Easter basket beside the jelly beans and marshmallow Peeps,” he said. “It’s insulting.”

Nonetheless, privately held Russell Stover Candies Inc., the third-largest American chocolate manufacturer, said it is targeting some of the most devout Christians — Hispanic Americans.

Pangburn, which Kansas City-based Russell Stover bought in 1999, has long had a hold in that market. The milk chocolate cross is about 6 inches high, adorned with a floral bouquet and filled with caramel made of goat’s milk, popular in Mexico and Latin America. Its packaging features Spanish more prominently than English.

Russell Stover President Tom Ward doesn’t expect the chocolate cross to overtake the chocolate bunny, but he does expect it to bring in new customers who “wouldn’t buy rabbits.”

“I think it’s a market that’s potentially overlooked,” said chocolate expert Clay Gordon, who runs the chocolate Web site Chocophile.com.

Loretta Behm, who was shopping for Easter candy at a CVS Pharmacy in the District of Columbia yesterday afternoon, said she wouldn’t have any qualms about eating a chocolate cross. The store was not selling the confections.

“It’s candy, for criminy’s sake,” she said. “If something like that is going to affect your religion, then that’s pretty sad. If it had caramel in it, I’d buy it.”

Mr. Ward said Russell Stover considered making other traditional images out of chocolate but eventually opted not to.

“A molded Jesus, for example, would not be a good call and a cross with Jesus on it wouldn’t be a good idea, either,” he said.

Staff writer Andrew Johnson contributed to this story from Washington.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2021 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide