- The Washington Times - Sunday, March 6, 2005

At the swearing-in of new Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff Thursday, President Bush said: “Osama bin Laden has urged the terrorist Zarqawi to form a group to conduct attacks outside Iraq, including here in the United States. We’re on a constant hunt for bin Laden.”

Well, not quite. I am sorry to report that, even as Mr. Bush was talking tough about being ready for al Qaeda-inspired terrorists laying plans to slip across the border, his own budget proposal reduces the number of Border Patrol agents the government will hire. The Bush budget includes enough to hire 210 new Border Patrol agents in 2006, which is an increase — but a far cry from the 2,000 agents he was mandated to hire each year for five years, starting in 2006, under a bill passed by Congress and signed by Mr. Bush into law.

The legislation’s goal was to double the size of the Border Patrol. But if Mr. Bush gets his way, there will be only teensy-weensy increases.

“I’m not sure that [Mr. Bush] understands the connection between border security and homeland security,” noted T.J. Bonner, president of the National Border Patrol Council, which represents Border Patrol agents. “I’m at a loss as to why they’re doing this. I suspect that it has something to do with the fact that they’re not serious about controlling illegal immigration — never have been,” Mr. Bonner continued.

“They seem to have this view that illegal immigration is healthy for the U.S. economy because we have an endless supply of cheap, exploitable labor coming across the border.”

That’s certainly how I see the administration’s failure to staff these new positions. Mr. Bush always has had a soft spot for cheap, illegal labor — hence his continued calls for amnesty programs that would encourage more illegal immigration.

And it’s hard to see his decision to pull back on the promised increase of the Border Patrol as anything but a willful decision to look the other way — an outrageous and dangerous choice when you consider Mr. Bush knows bin Laden would like to sneak terrorists over the border.

Rep. Christopher Cox, California Republican and chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security, told me I’m wrong. That is “an easy thing for talk-radio” folks to say, Mr. Cox noted on the phone, but Mr. Bush is looking at the bottom line and at what works. The cost of expanding training facilities is much higher than anticipated, and the administration thinks spending on new technologies to enhance border surveillance can be more effective.

To that first point, Carlos Espinosa, a spokesman for Rep. Tom Tancredo, Colorado Republican, had a quick response. “There’s probably no one” in the House of Representatives “who’s going to say we shouldn’t fund extra facilities to protect the country from another [terrorist] attack.” The cost to the economy of a terrorist attack would be many times greater than training thousands of new agents.

As Mr. Bonner says, new technology is good, but it can’t help much if there is no one to detain the little dots on the screens.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection spokeswoman Kristi Clemens just returned from El Paso, where she saw the new technology — part of America’s Shield Initiative — at work. The new scanning spotted 14 people near the border, agents were deployed, and 14 uninvited guests were apprehended. With the new officers and new equipment, and a bigger budget, Border Patrol agents will be able to monitor “constant intelligence” and deploy agents where needed, she said.

Miss Clemens noted that the Border Patrol detained 1.1 million illegal immigrants last year. That’s good, but there is no way to know for sure how many illegal crossers got into this country.

While most were looking for jobs — not targets — they found those jobs at a high cost to state and local governments, which have to pay for emergency medical care and incarceration because the federal government doesn’t pay for its failures.

And if a terrorist does slip through a porous border, Americans could pay with their very lives.

Mr. Cox compared the overall border situation today with a fence along the U.S./Mexico border in San Diego — he called it “a $14 million fence with a 3-mile hole.” The House recently voted to fill the hole in the fence. Now, it should make sure that Washington fills the hole in the Border Patrol.

Debra J. Saunders is a nationally syndicated columnist.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide