- The Washington Times - Friday, May 13, 2005

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee yesterday voted to send John R. Bolton’s nomination to be ambassador to the United Nations to the Senate floor but without the customary endorsement, dealing a public blow to President Bush but giving him time to try to rescue his pick.

The committee voted 10-8 to “report the nomination without recommendation,” with all Republicans voting in favor and all Democrats opposing it.

The key vote was Sen. George V. Voinovich, Ohio Republican, who opposes Mr. Bolton but didn’t want to bottle up Mr. Bush’s pick in committee and prevent a full Senate vote.

“After hours of deliberation, telephone calls, personal conversations, reading hundreds of pages of transcripts and asking for guidance from above, I have come to the determination that the United States can do better than John Bolton,” said Mr. Voinovich, although he added that he is “not so arrogant to think that I should impose my judgment” on the entire Senate by blocking the nomination.

A 9-9 tie vote would have caused the nomination to fail.

“It doesn’t appear that Mr. Bolton has the confidence of the majority of this committee,” said Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr., the top Democrat on the panel, who said Mr. Bush should take notice.

But the administration and its allies stepped up their advocacy yesterday afternoon, and White House press secretary Scott McClellan predicted success on the Senate floor.

“We’re confident that the Senate will move forward and confirm his nomination when it reaches the floor,” he said.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist’s chief of staff said there is no schedule for a floor vote, but he expects that it will be before the Memorial Day recess.

Sen. Barbara Boxer, California Democrat, made a new attempt to derail the Bolton nomination. Spokeswoman Natalie Ravitz told reporters that her boss “put a hold on the nomination” late in the afternoon, after the panel vote.

The spokeswoman did not say how long Mrs. Boxer might use the measure, which prevents Mr. Bolton’s nomination from being raised on the Senate floor.

Democrats also could decide to initiate a filibuster — a decision they said they haven’t reached.

Mr. Voinovich’s strong statement of opposition seemed to surprise Democrats.

Sen. Christopher J. Dodd, Connecticut Democrat, called it “a senatorial moment,” and Mr. Biden, who spoke after Mr. Voinovich, said there wasn’t much to add.

“Quite frankly, much of what I was going to say was going to be redundant — and not as elegant — as what we just heard,” said Mr. Biden, although he did deliver a half-hour critique both of Mr. Bolton’s history and of the administration for blocking access to documents during the committee’s investigation.

The investigation into Mr. Bolton encompassed interviews with 29 witnesses, producing about 1,000 pages of transcripts, and the committee asked for and received 830 pages of documents from the administration about Mr. Bolton. Democrats, though, said certain information was not provided, including a list of U.S. officials who Mr. Bolton wanted identified in connection with foreign communications intercepted by U.S. intelligence.

Some Republicans on the committee said Mr. Bolton’s record of strong comments and determined pursuit of his positions makes him the right man for this job, while other Republicans said what matters is that he’s Mr. Bush’s pick.

“The president has made it clear that this is not a casual appointment. He wants a specific person to do a specific job,” said committee Chairman Richard G. Lugar, Indiana Republican.

Sen. Norm Coleman, Minnesota Republican, said Democrats always had opposed Mr. Bolton.

“Their objection from the very beginning was always about policy,” he said. “It went from there to procedures, to process, ultimately to personality. In the end, we got the nomination to the floor.”

Seven Democrats voted for Mr. Bolton in 2001, when he was confirmed 57-43 as undersecretary of state for arms control and international security, but Mr. Bolton cannot expect the same support this time. Two of those Democrats have retired, and Sen. Russell D. Feingold, Wisconsin Democrat, who supported him last time, announced his opposition three weeks ago. Also, Sen. James M. Jeffords, Vermont independent, who voted for Mr. Bolton in 2001, said he will vote no.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2020 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide