- The Washington Times - Tuesday, May 17, 2005

To see how, in Washington, special interests often outweigh the greater needs of America, one acronym will suffice: DR-CAFTA.

The debate over DR-CAFTA (the proposed free-trade agreement between the United States and the Dominican Republic, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua) has focused so far on the wrong question. Instead of asking, “What happens if DR-CAFTA passes?” we ought to consider “What happens if it doesn’t pass?”

After all, were DR-CAFTA defeated, it would hurt not only our economy but those of several Central American countries. And it would have larger ramifications, for years to come, on U.S. security interests in Latin America, illegal immigration, imports from China and America’s free-trade agenda.

What do we risk losing if DR-CAFTA doesn’t pass? Consider these often-overlooked ramifications:

? U.S. security interests in Latin America would be undermined. Central America has made great strides toward democracy, economic freedom and the rule of law since the 1980s. Leftist dictator Fidel Castro of Cuba and dictator aspirant Hugo Chavez of Venezuela oppose free-trade agreements such as DR-CAFTA and the proposed Free Trade Agreement of the Americas (FTAA) because they lock in economic openness and forge closer ties to the U.S. Failure to pass DR-CAFTA would play into the hands of Mr. Castro and Mr. Chavez by confirming what the Latin American public already suspects: the U.S. doesn’t care about the region.

? The illegal immigration problem would be aggravated. A majority of the citizens in Central America and the Dominican Republic are informally employed, underemployed or lack jobs altogether. Illegal immigrants come to the U.S. searching for jobs. DR-CAFTA would help generate jobs in these countries and reduce incentives to illegally enter the U.S.

? Pressure from Chinese imports would increase. Because of the expiration of the global system of quotas on textiles and apparel, Chinese production surges. Central America is an important market for American textile producers, and DR-CAFTA will help keep that market viable. Under DR-CAFTA, more than 90 percent of the garments made in Central America will be made with U.S. textiles and yarn. Without DR-CAFTA, Central American textile manufacturers likely will migrate to China, not only increasing Chinese exports, but eliminating an important textile market.

? America’s further gains through open trade would be stalled. Our economy thrives on trade. As trade’s portion of gross domestic product rises, so does the U.S. economy and per capita income. It’s in our interest to continue expanding trade by lowering barriers to trade. But a half-dozen other free-trade agreements could founder if Congress opposes DR-CAFTA.

Economically, DR-CAFTA is a clear winner for America. Under existing trade preferences, the Dominican Republic and Central America already have extensive duty-free access to the U.S. market, while U.S. exports face significant barriers. Therefore, the benefits to America would come at very little cost.

But perhaps even more important, DR-CAFTA would bolster political stability and enhance hemispheric stability and security at the crossroads of North and South America. Meanwhile, the handful of groups who oppose free trade merely want to protect their turf, whether or not their arguments have merit.

Sugar producers oppose DR-CAFTA because it would increase the sugar other countries can send to the U.S. without prohibitive tariffs. That boost would amount to about 11/2 spoonfuls per American per week.

Despite the tiny effect of DR-CAFTA, sugar lobbyists exert enormous efforts to stop it. For some members of Congress, this spoonful of sugar — or, more specifically, the sugar industry’s contribution — outweighs all other trade and security concerns.

Labor and environmental activists grumble because DR-CAFTA doesn’t require those countries to adopt U.S.-level regulations. But wages and environmental protections are linked to a nation’s income: As income increases, so do wages and environmental protections. Defeating DR-CAFTA actually would work against these lobbyists’ stated goals.

But free-trade agreements bring real economic benefits to people through the products they buy and make. When all is said and done, DR-CAFTA is a good deal for most Americans.

Moreover, DR-CAFTA isn’t just about trade. It’s also about national security, illegal immigration, stopping the spread of leftist dictators and the future of the U.S. economy. These are the potential losses if DR-CAFTA doesn’t pass.

The benefits of passing it far outweigh the narrow special interests of the lobbyists arguing against it.

Brett D. Schaefer is the Jay Kingham fellow in international regulatory affairs in the Center for International Trade and Economics at the Heritage Foundation.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide