- The Washington Times - Thursday, May 26, 2005

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — The treasurer of a political action committee formed by U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay broke the law by not reporting hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions, a judge ruled yesterday in a lawsuit brought by Democratic candidates.

State District Judge Joe Hart said the money — much of it in corporate contributions — should have been reported to the Texas Ethics Commission.

The judge ordered Bill Ceverha, treasurer of Texans for a Republican Majority, to pay nearly $200,000 in damages. The money will be divided among those who brought the lawsuit against Mr. Ceverha — five Democrats who lost state legislative races in 2002.

Mr. DeLay, Texas Republican, said of the ruling: “I haven’t read it yet. All I know is that it happened.”

“The ruling nowhere mentions Tom DeLay, and that confirms what we’ve been saying all along — that the dispute really has little, if anything, to do with Tom DeLay,” said Bobby Burchfield, attorney for the lawmaker.

The civil case is separate from a criminal investigation being conducted by the district attorney in Austin into whether the PAC funneled illegal corporate contributions to Republican candidates for the Texas Legislature. Three of Mr. DeLay’s top fundraisers and eight corporations were indicted last year. Mr. Ceverha has not been charged.

Mr. DeLay has not been charged with any crime and was protected by congressional immunity from having to testify in the lawsuit, but he has been barraged on Capitol Hill with accusations of unethical conduct. DeLay spokesman Dan Allen did not return a call for comment yesterday.

In the civil case, the Democrats said Mr. Ceverha violated the state law designed to keep elections free from “the taint of corporate cash.” They said corporate money donated to the PAC was spent on political research, polling, mailing, fundraising and conferences.

Under Texas law, corporate money can be used by PACs for administrative purposes, but not for direct campaign expenses. In his ruling, the judge dealt with the election code reporting requirements, not with the how the money was spent.

Judge Hart found that contributions of corporate and noncorporate money totaling $613,433 should have been reported by Mr. Ceverha, along with expenditures of $684,507.

Mr. Ceverha’s attorneys argued in court that the PAC operated legally despite confusing state campaign-funding laws.

The plaintiffs welcomed the judge’s ruling as a good first step in rooting out illegal corporate spending during the 2002 Texas elections.

“It sheds light on the illegal acts of Texans for a Republican Majority,” attorney Cris Feldman said.

Terry Scarborough, Mr. Ceverha’s attorney, said the case will be appealed and suggested that the dispute is mostly about the Democrats’ anger over losing the elections.

During the 2002 elections, the Republicans won control of the Texas House for the first time since Reconstruction. The Republican Party later used its majority to redraw the state’s congressional districts and send more Republicans to Capitol Hill.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide