- The Washington Times - Thursday, May 5, 2005

As Saddam Hussein sulks in his prison cell, members of his Coalition of the Evil outside have devised yet another grisly innovation in barbarism.

They have moved beyond simply packing a vehicle with explosives and rolling it to a marketplace or some other ill-defended venue before blowing it up. That was a very successful way to murder women, children, old men and young men — the last of whom were volunteering to build a free Iraq. Now the Coalition of the Evil, composed of Saddam’s faithful, indigenous religious lunatics, and the terrorists of Abu Musab Zarqawi, have doubled the deadliness of their bombers. After setting off their initial explosions, the murderers wait for ambulances and rescuers to arrive. They hope large crowds of onlookers will form. Then they send in more suicidal killers.

This poses a moral dilemma for the prospective rescuers. Do they rush in to aid the injured and the dying, hoping no second round of bombs is planned? Or do they wait, allowing the injured to suffer and die unattended?

During the bloody 20th century, I cannot recall ever hearing of the communist revolutionaries or the Nazis attempting this tactic. Possibly they did. But surely they never employed this gruesome tactic on the scale of Saddam and Zarqawi’s thugs. As a means of terror and destruction, it is indeed an innovation.

Bearing in mind that Saddam had turned his country into a vast arsenal with weaponry lying around estimated to equal about 60 percent of our entire conventional arsenal worldwide, there are probably enough explosives in the hands of the Coalition of the Evil to continue this sort of carnage a long time.

What will eventually end it is the police action of the U.S. Army aided by the valiant Australians, British and others from the Coalition of the Willing. We shall capture the murderers’ leaders or kill them along with their henchmen.

As a letter from a Zarqawi lieutenant, recovered in a Baghdad raid, indicates, we are making headway in breaking down the command structure of the Coalition of the Evil. Zarqawi’s correspondent writes, “The morale has weakened and lines of mujahideen have become separated due to some leaders’ action.” The letter meant for Zarqawi goes on to show there is dissatisfaction among the mujahideen — is Arabic, I presume, for murderer. The distressed murderer pontificates, “God does not accept such actions and that will delay victory. We do have big mistakes where some of us have been discarded.”

For now the Coalition of the Evil is stepping up the carnage assisted by this innovation of attacking rescuers and onlookers. Perhaps the intelligentsia in France and Germany and other European countries so critical of our Iraqi presence will expatiate on this in their scholarly seminars and cafes.

Some of Old Europe’s most robust thinking is done in cafes. In Paris in the early 1940s, celebrated intellectuals such as Jean-Paul Sartre discoursed on the vulgarity of the English-speaking leaders as Nazi tourists strolled by. Old Europe’s history of appeasement goes back a long way and has taught today’s appeasers nothing. I think President Jacques Chirac and Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder would look elegant bearded and in turbans — though their predecessors from the 1930s generally ended up in concentration camps.

It is appalling to watch these cowards sit back while Iraqis are murdered by the thugs of Saddam and Zarqawi, the little Hitlers of the moment. They actually claim moral and intellectual superiority to President George W. Bush, Prime Minister Tony Blair and Australian Prime Minister John Howard.

During the Cold War the predecessors of these fops made the same claim, but with a difference. Their intelligentsia had excogitated elegant arguments about how President Harry Truman missed opportunities to compose peace with Josef Stalin in the late 1940s. Historians pored over documents that supposedly implicated the West in starting the Cold War.

When the Cold War was brought to an end by Western resolve at the end of the 1980s, these same sophists had more documents and theories demonstrating the Soviet Union was not a threat.

In the present conflict, the brutes against us are so barbaric it is difficult for today’s sophists to argue the Coalition of the Evil is not responsible for its atrocities. Instead they argue we should not be in Iraq. Apparently the Iraqis were better off with Saddam, a tyrant who committed genocide against his countrymen and such ghastly tortures as putting captives through paper shredders — feet first.

The people of Iraq suffer today not because of their liberators but because Old Europe and the United Nations have failed to join us in investing the country with enough troops to run the insurgents down quickly. The insurgents are for a certitude being run down. The carnage will end.

Then, doubtless, the European sophisticates will purr on about humanitarianism and world peace — matters they have so little experience with.

R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. is founder and editor in chief of the American Spectator, a contributing editor to the New York Sun, an adjunct professor at the Hudson Institute and the author of “Madame Hillary: The Dark Road to the White House.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide