- The Washington Times - Friday, May 6, 2005

NEW YORK (AP) — To the dismay of homosexual-rights activists, the Food and Drug Administration is about to implement new rules recommending that any man who has engaged in homosexual sex in the previous five years be barred from serving as an anonymous sperm donor.

The FDA has rejected calls to scrap the provision, insisting that homosexual men collectively pose a higher-than-average risk of carrying the AIDS virus. Critics accuse the FDA of stigmatizing all homosexual men rather than adopting a screening process that focuses on high-risk sexual behavior by any would-be donor.

“Under these rules, a heterosexual man who had unprotected sex with HIV-positive prostitutes would be OK as a donor one year later, but a gay man in a monogamous, safe-sex relationship is not OK unless he’s been celibate for five years,” said Leland Traiman, director of a clinic in Alameda, Calif., that seeks homosexual sperm donors.

Mr. Traiman said adequate safety assurances can be provided by testing a sperm donor at the time of the initial donation, then freezing the sperm for a six-month quarantine and testing the donor again to be sure there is no new sign of HIV or other infectious diseases.

Although there is disagreement over whether the FDA guideline regarding homosexual men will have the force of law, most doctors and clinics are expected to observe it.

The practical effect of the provision — part of a broader set of cell and tissue donation regulations that take effect May 25 — is hard to gauge. It is likely to affect some lesbian couples who want a child and prefer to use a homosexual man’s sperm for artificial insemination.

But it is the provision’s symbolic aspect that troubles homosexual-rights groups. Kevin M. Cathcart, executive director of Lambda Legal, has called it “policy based on bigotry.”

In a letter to the FDA, Lambda Legal has suggested a screening procedure based on sexual behavior, not sexual orientation. Prospective donors — homosexual or heterosexual — would be rejected if they had engaged in unprotected sex in the previous 12 months with an HIV-positive person, an illegal- drug user, or “an individual of unknown HIV status outside of a monogamous relationship.”

But an FDA spokeswoman cited agency documents suggesting that officials felt the broader exclusion was prudent even if it affected homosexual men who practice safe sex.

“The FDA is very much aware that strict exclusion policies eliminate some safe donors,” said one document.

Many doctors and fertility clinics already reject homosexual sperm donors, citing the pending FDA rules or existing regulations of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide