- The Washington Times - Sunday, November 27, 2005

PROVIDENCE, R.I. (AP) — An old police tradition of requiring off-duty officers to carry their weapons — “always armed, always on duty” — is being scaled back in many police departments after the shootings of off-duty officers by colleagues who thought they were criminals.

The policies require officers to respond to crimes even when they’re not on duty, a requirement supporters say protects officers from criminals bent on revenge.

But critics point to the shooting of officers in Providence, R.I.; Orlando, Fla.; Oakland, Calif.; and elsewhere as reasons for change.

Providence’s policy is at the center of a $20 million civil rights lawsuit over the shooting of Sgt. Cornel Young Jr., who was killed in 2000 while he was off duty and trying to break up a fight. He was dressed in baggy jeans, an overcoat and a baseball cap, and he was carrying a gun.

“Our situation is the extreme example of what can go wrong,” said Sgt. Robert Paniccia, president of the Providence police union.



Sgt. Young’s mother, Leisa Young, says the rookie officer who shot him was not adequately trained to recognize off-duty or plainclothes officers.

The International Association of Chiefs of Police has called “always on duty” policies a costly tradition. The group, which has more than 20,000 members, recommends that off-duty officers who witness a crime call for assistance rather than pull a weapon.

According to the FBI, 43 police officers have been killed since 1987 by friendly fire. Some were caught in crossfire or killed by firearms mishaps. A handful, including Sgt. Young, were mistaken for criminals and shot by fellow officers.

Earlier this year, an Orlando police officer fatally shot a plainclothes officer who was investigating underage drinking outside the Citrus Bowl. The plainclothes officer had gotten into a scuffle with tailgaters and fired his gun into the air when the Orlando officer shot him, witnesses said.

In Providence, carrying a gun is now optional for off-duty officers, who are encouraged instead to be good witnesses if they see a crime, Sgt. Paniccia said. The police union in Washington succeeded in securing similar rules after three off-duty officers were killed in separate incidents, said Officer Gregory Greene, the union’s chairman.

The Los Angeles Police Department allows its officers to carry their weapons off duty but doesn’t require it, said department spokeswoman April Harding.

David Klinger, a criminology professor at the University of Missouri-St. Louis, was a Los Angeles policeman and said he usually carried a gun off duty. If police officers are properly trained, officers should have the option of carrying a gun for their protection, he said.

“I don’t want to be driving through the ghetto without a gun,” he said. “What if some knucklehead I arrested spots me?”

Threatened officers instinctively focus on the perceived danger and tune out other information that could be crucial to split-second decision making, Mr. Klinger said. That’s why it’s important to have protocols in place to identify one another, he said.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide