- The Washington Times - Saturday, October 8, 2005

The naming of White House Counsel Harriet Miers to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor has provoked serious concern among some conservatives. They worry Miss Miers may take positions all too similar to Justice O’Connor’s on issues like affirmative action. Justice O’Connor was often the swing vote on controversial social issues from abortion to school prayer, and she actually wrote the majority opinion in one of the most important decisions on affirmative action in the last two decades. Writing for a 5-4 majority in a University of Michigan law school case, Grutter v. Bollinger, Justice O’Connor upheld the use of race to achieve diversity, but she then joined the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Anthony Kennedy and Stephen Breyer to reject the university’s affirmative action program for undergraduates in Gratz v. Bollinger.

Most conservatives hoped that with Justice O’Connor gone, the Supreme Court might revisit affirmative action with a decision that once and for all rejects racial preferences as permissible public policy. But it may be that even without further court action, the granting of preference to minority students is beginning to lose favor on college campuses.

A recent study by two sociologists at the University of California at Davis, which looked at public and private undergraduate admissions at some 1,300 institutions from 1986-2003, concluded the number of schools that considered race as a factor in admission declined sharply after 1995. After holding steady for nearly a decade, the proportion of public four-year institutions that acknowledged using race as a plus-factor in admission declined from 60 percent to 35 percent, while the percentage of private schools using preferences fell from 57 to 45. The study’s authors conclude litigation and the threat of litigation were factors discouraging schools from considering race in admissions.

Many conservatives worried after the University of Michigan decisions that schools would feel justified continuing to use racial preferences, but the opposite may be the case.

For at least two decades after the 1978 Bakke decision that first introduced “diversity” as a “compelling state interest” permitting race-based preferences in admissions, most elite colleges and universities boldly applied racial double standards in determining whom to admit. In analyzing admissions data from nearly 70 public undergraduate and graduate programs, my Center for Equal Opportunity (CEO) found the schools we studied routinely admitted black and Hispanic students with substantially lower grades and test scores. In many cases, being black or Hispanic did not appear simply one among many factors weighed, but the decisive factor.

In a separate study, George Mason University professor David J. Armor found, at the University of Virginia in 2003, a black student was 106 times likelier to be admitted than a white student with the same grades and test scores. At William and Mary Law School, the odds favoring black students were 267-1.

But in the wake of Grutter and Gratz, schools are struggling with how much weight they can give race or ethnicity without running afoul of the law.

The rollback of affirmative action won’t necessarily mean fewer opportunities for blacks and Hispanics. More blacks and Hispanics are going to college than at any time in our nation’s history. Data from the Census Bureau and the National Center for Education Statistics show blacks and Hispanics are nearly a quarter of the undergraduate population at four year institutions and 36 percent of community college enrollment. Over the decade 1993-2003, black enrollment in higher education grew from 10 percent to 13 percent of combined undergraduate and graduate students. Hispanics posted even more impressive gains over the same period, from 4 percent of all college students to 10 percent. The decline in race-based admissions suggests more of these students may have gone to colleges and universities that better matched their preparation, schools where skin color was no longer the admission ticket, and where they could compete equally with white and Asian peers. That is certainly so in California, which banned racial preferences in college admissions at state schools in 1996.

Even without the noblesse oblige of a Supreme Court justice to place a thumb on the scale on their behalf, blacks and Hispanics are demonstrating they can succeed the old-fashioned way — through hard work and their own efforts.

Linda Chavez is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide