- The Washington Times - Tuesday, September 20, 2005

The image has achieved iconic status: 12-year-old Muhammad al-Dura crouching behind a concrete barrier next to his father as (presumably) Israeli bullets ricochet around the pair. Moments later, the boy lies dead in his father’s arms.

The video dates from September 2000, the start of the Second Intifada, and has become the world’s favorite image of supposed Israeli brutality. France 2, the network that supplied the only footage of the shooting, reported al-Dura had “died under a hail of Israeli bullets.”

Hussein Ibish, communications director of the Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee, declared the boy’s death “one of the most damaging images in the history of Zionism.” The New York Times called it “a potent new symbol of what angry Palestinians contend is their continued victimization.” The Cairo street that houses the Israeli Consulate was renamed “the Boulevard of Muhammad al-Dura.” A park bears his name in Morocco. Belgium put his face on a stamp.

Al-Dura’s image is also spliced into the video Daniel Pearl’s killers made of his beheading. As Stephanie Gutmann recounts in her outstanding new book “The Other War: Israelis, Palestinians, and the Struggle for Media Supremacy,” “After Pearl makes his final statement in the confession portion — ‘my father is a Jew; my mother is a Jew; I am a Jew’ — there is a cut to Mohammed and father huddling together. Seconds before Pearl is laid on the ground and hands begin to saw at his throat with long knives, a still shot of Jamal al-Dura clasping his dying son flashes on the screen.”

Every major media outlet in the world carried the al-Dura story. The narrative: Father and son wandered too close to an Israeli outpost protecting the village of Netzarim. When Israeli soldiers fired upon the pair, the father, Jamal al-Dura, waved to show they were innocent civilians. They were “answered,” as Time.com put it, “with a fusillade of bullets.”

When every major news organization in the world reports a story, it would be fair to assume many reporters observed this event. In fact, as Miss Gutmann and Nidra Poller in Commentary both document, every single reporter relied on the same snippet of tape provided by France 2, though many shamefully phrased their reports as if they were eyewitnesses.

Cameraman Talal Abu Rahmeh, a Palestinian stringer for a number of news agencies, testified that after a 5-minute exchange of gunfire between Palestinian police and Israelis, the Israelis fired on the unarmed father and child for 45 minutes.

Only much later, after the story had blanketed the globe and become a recruiting tool for suicide bombers in many countries, did questions about the narrative begin trickling out. The Israel Defense Forces performed a series of re-creations of the scene (after initially acknowledging its soldiers might have accidentally shot the pair) and concluded the father and son simply could not have been hit from the Israeli position.

No autopsy was performed on the boy’s body. No bullets were ever retrieved. But other investigators have noted that the size and shape of the bullet holes on the concrete wall behind the pair were inconsistent with M-16s the Israelis used.

As both Miss Gutmann and Miss Poller document, the camera crews had set up at Netzarim in the morning before a single shot was fired. Why? Miss Poller has viewed all the footage she could obtain from the other news organizations at Netzarim that day and discovered that, in addition to actual scenes, the cameras also captured a number of vignettes in which “Palestinian stringers sporting prestigious logos on their vests and cameras are seen filming battle scenes staged behind the abandoned factory, well out of range of Israeli gunfire.”

When Esther Schapira, a German documentary filmmaker, asked France 2 to permit her to view the entire day’s film from Netzarim, not the just the 51 seconds that had so electrified the world, she was rebuffed.

Some have theorized al-Dura was accidentally killed by Palestinians and then immediately transformed into a martyr to cover up the mistake. Others believe he may have been intentionally sacrificed because his father had been a little too friendly with Israelis. We probably will never know.

One thing is certain: The story of the Israeli soldiers’ deliberate killing of 12-year-old Muhammad al-Dura was a damnable lie.

Mona Charen is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide