- The Washington Times - Sunday, September 25, 2005

VIENNA, Austria — The U.N. atomic-watchdog agency yesterday put Iran just one step away from referral to the Security Council unless Tehran eases suspicions about its nuclear activities — a move the United States has pushed for years.

The chief U.S. delegate to the International Atomic Energy Agency hailed the decision, describing it as a wake-up call for Tehran “to come clean” or face the consequences.

But his Iranian counterpart criticized approval of the resolution and warned of retaliation. Tehran maintains its nuclear program is for generating electricity.

The decision by the 35-nation IAEA board represented a victory for Washington, which asserts Iran has nuclear-weapons ambitions. For more than two years, the Bush administration has failed to enlist board support to haul Iran before the council for purportedly violating commitments under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

“The international community is … not satisfied with the level of confidence-building measures Iran has so far taken,” IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei said.

Yesterday’s decision was far from unanimous, though. A total of 22 of the 35 board nations voted for the U.S.-backed European Union motion, while 12 nations abstained.

Those abstaining included Russia and China, both veto-wielding members of the Security Council, diplomats said. The others were developing nations.

Those supporting the resolution included the United States, European countries, Canada, Australia and Japan. They were joined by India, Peru, Singapore and Ecuador, reflecting some support in the developing nations’ camp.

Javier Solana, the chief EU foreign-policy official, welcomed the board’s “broad support” and said it left the door open to negotiations with Tehran.

Venezuela cast the only vote against.

The resolution called on the board to consider reporting Iran at a future meeting. As grounds, it mentioned noncompliance with the nuclear arms control treaty and suspicions that Iran’s nuclear activities could threaten international peace and security.

Diplomats from countries backing the resolution said it set Iran up for referral as early as November, when the board next meets in regular session, unless Tehran dispels international concerns.

Outlining what Iran must do to avoid such action, the draft called on it to give IAEA experts access to nuclear-related documents and sites, suspend all enrichment-related and reprocessing activities and ratify an inspection agreement with the IAEA.

Iran last month resumed uranium conversion — a precursor of uranium enrichment, which can make material for either nuclear fuel or the fissile core of warheads.

The chief U.S. representative to the meeting, Gregory Schulte, said the approval reflected board concern over Iran’s “long history of concealment and deception.”

In opting for referral, the board is “concerned that Iran’s activities pose an increasing threat to international peace and security,” Mr. Schulte said. “The IAEA has called on Iran to … come clean.”

But Iran’s delegation head, Javad Vaeidi, said the vote was evidence “there is no consensus on the way forward.” He also warned, “Threat invokes threat.”

Tehran warned Friday that if the resolution was approved, it could respond by starting uranium enrichment — a possible path to nuclear arms — and by reducing IAEA powers to inspect its activities under the additional agreement it signed but had not yet ratified.

Both threats were contained in unsigned letters and shown by a member of the Iranian delegation to Mr. ElBaradei, diplomats accredited to the agency said on the condition of anonymity because their information was confidential.

The Security Council could impose sanctions if it determines that Iran violated the treaty, but the draft did not mention sanctions in recognition of Russian and Chinese opposition.

A nation’s failure to comply with the nonproliferation treaty is automatic grounds for a report to the Security Council under IAEA statutes. The draft said that “Iran’s many failures and breaches of its obligations … constitute noncompliance.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide