- The Washington Times - Sunday, April 16, 2006

NEW YORK (AP) — Along a gritty stretch of street in Brooklyn, police this month quietly started an ambitious plan to combat street crime and terrorism.

But instead of cops on the beat, wireless video cameras peer down from lampposts about 30 feet above the sidewalk.

They were the first installment of a program to place 500 cameras throughout the city at a cost of $9 million. Hundreds of additional cameras could follow if the city receives $81.5 million in federal grants it has requested to safeguard Lower Manhattan and parts of midtown with a surveillance “ring of steel” modeled after security measures in London’s financial district.

Officials with the New York Police Department — which considers itself at the forefront of counterterrorism since the September 11, 2001, attacks — say the money would be well-spent, especially since revelations that al Qaeda members once cased the New York Stock Exchange and other financial institutions.

“We have every reason to believe New York remains in the cross hairs, so we have to do what it takes to protect the city,” Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly said last week at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government.

The city already has about 1,000 cameras in the subways, with 2,100 scheduled to be in place by 2008. An additional 3,100 cameras monitor city housing projects.

New York’s approach isn’t unique. Chicago spent roughly $5 million on a 2,000-camera system. Officials with the Homeland Security Department in Washington plan to spend $9.8 million for surveillance cameras and sensors on a rail line near the Capitol. Philadelphia has increasingly relied on video surveillance.

Privacy advocates say the NYPD’s camera plan needs more study and safeguards to preserve privacy and guard against abuses such as racial profiling and voyeurism.

The department “is installing cameras first and asking questions later,” said Donna Lieberman, executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union.

Police officials insist that law-abiding New Yorkers have nothing to fear because the cameras will be restricted to public areas.

“The police department must be flexible to meet an ever-changing threat,” Commissioner Kelly said.

Miss Lieberman concedes cameras can help investigators identify suspects once a crime has been committed, but argues that they can’t prevent crime. She cited a 2002 study that concluded that surveillance cameras used in 14 British cities had little or no impact on crime rates — just as they didn’t keep terrorists from bombing the London subway system last year.

Still, New York police were impressed that their British counterparts drew on 80,000 videotapes to identify and retrace the routes of the subway-system suicide bombers and the suspects in a failed follow-up attack.

Timothy Horner, a specialist with the Kroll security firm and a former NYPD captain, said the measures make sense.

“It’s not a cure-all, and the department is not thinking that way,” he said. “But we really want law enforcement to use whatever tools they can.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More

Click to Hide