Sunday, April 30, 2006

STIGLER, Okla. (AP) — The 8-foot granite slab planted in the Haskell County Courthouse lawn makes the Ten Commandments easy to read and hard to miss from the state highway that doubles as this town’s main thoroughfare.

The monument, erected with private money in 2004 with the county’s approval, doesn’t stop traffic and courthouse visitors on a recent morning barely gave it a glance.

“I don’t see anything wrong with it,” Launa Medlock, 73, said. “We’ve got to have religion, too.”

Still, it has drawn national attention, and county officials have been preparing to defend it in a trial that begins tomorrow in federal court.

Public support for the monument is strong in this town of 2,700, about 90 miles southeast of Tulsa. There’s a church for roughly every 125 men, women and children, and two signs advertising places of worship flanking the courthouse lawn.

John Altstatt, a 42-year-old contractor who does business with the county, said some people might see the marker as “church pushed down their throat.” But he expressed ambivalence.

“I don’t have to look at if I don’t want to,” he said.

The lawsuit challenging the marker’s location comes during a national debate over displays of the Ten Commandments on public property. Court challenges have yielded mixed results.

The U.S. Supreme Court, in a pair of 5-4 rulings last year, allowed the Ten Commandments to be displayed outside the Texas state Capitol but not inside two Kentucky courthouses, where the justices said they promoted a religious message. The court ruled religious displays are not inherently unconstitutional and must be considered on a case-by-case basis.

The non-jury trial, being held in Muskogee before U.S. District Judge Ronald White, centers on an argument that the monument violates constitutional protections against government endorsement of religion.

The American Civil Liberties Union filed the complaint against the Haskell County commissioners on behalf of James W. Green, a longtime county resident.

“All Mr. Green is asking is that the government not show favoritism for a religious document which is in his mind contrary to the greater message of Jesus’ teaching,” said Micheal Salem, an attorney representing Mr. Green. The lawsuit seeks no damages — only that the monument be declared unconstitutional and ordered removed from public property.

A local lay pastor, Mike Bush, won permission from county commissioners to erect the monument and raised funds with the help of Haskell County churches and youth groups.

The commissioners say they granted Mr. Bush’s request because of the historical significance of the Ten Commandments and the Mayflower Compact, which appears on the marker’s reverse side.

Because the county had allowed other monuments on the courthouse lawn — including tributes to war dead, two graduating classes and Choctaw Indians who died on the Trail of Tears — it could have been sued had it denied Mr. Bush’s request, said Joel Oster, an attorney representing Haskell County in the lawsuit.

“This is a free speech case,” Mr. Oster said. “There’s just a lot of stuff on this courthouse lawn. If the county commissioners had told Mike ‘no,’ it would have violated his rights.”

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2021 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide