- The Washington Times - Thursday, August 17, 2006

Well, it is a very pleasant time to be in Washington. Senators and representatives alike have vacated the premises. Most have headed off to ply their trade on their constituents. The off-year elections are approaching, and most of our federal legislators want another stint at what the Democrats call “public service,” a euphemism for what all reasonable observers call the “public trough.”

Democrats are in a sunny mood. As they see it, we are losing in Iraq. We are losing the war on terror. And Wal-Mart just posted a quarterly loss. All this means, so the Democrats believe, that they will sweep the Senate and the House this fall. Their solution to the war in Iraq and to the war on terror is: “Come Home America.” They want our troops out of Iraq. They advocate fighting the war on terror closer to home. As New York’s Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton puts it, “We still have not done what we need to do to protect our ports, our borders, our bridges, our transit systems, our rail lines — it’s a long list.”

So “Come Home America.” That is the refrain last made famous by Mrs. Clinton’s presidential candidate in 1972, Sen. George McGovern. She really has not changed all that much since then, nor have the rest of the Democrats.

President Bush wants us to fight our wars on foreign soil. Most Americans agree. According to the recent Newsweek poll, 55 percent of the citizenry favor how he is handling the war on terror and homeland security, an improvement of 11 percent over the last two months. Doubtless, Americans are not as approving of the way he has handled the war in Iraq, but their major concern is terrorism, according to a CBS News poll conducted after the British broke up that terror ring last week. Now the American electorate will have the next three months to weigh the merits of the Democratic alternative to the president’s approach to national security. My guess is the electorate will again reject “Come Home America.”

In an off-year election the president’s party is supposed to suffer losses on Capitol Hill. It is indicative of the dreadful condition of the Democrats that the president’s party actually gained seats in the last off-year election. Surely this time the Republicans will lose seats, but I predict they will still hang on to both houses.

The first reason is the president’s insight that it is best to fight terrorists in foreign lands rather than wait for them to arrive here is more appealing to Americans than the Democrats’ “Come Home America” strategy. Most Americans also understand that, to thwart another September 11, 2001-style attack, the government will have to surveil bank transactions, communications and travel. Frankly, I think most Americans would also approve of profiling, and I suspect our government will be profiling rather soon. The only outrage I have heard about reports of government surveillance has come from journalists, the American Civil Liberties Union, and the Democratic leadership, which is to say the Democratic leadership and its agents.

This brings us to the second reason the Republicans will maintain both houses this fall. The Democrats have no appealing alternative to the Republicans. This is true on a whole range of matters from national security to the war on terror to the economy. The Democrats have been shrieking about the economy for six years, six years that have mainly been years of economic growth. Their alternative is to raise taxes, which surely is an alternative to growth. Yet my guess is that most Americans prefer growth.

A year or more ago the complaint heard most often about the Democratic Party was that it had not settled on a message. That was claptrap then, and it is claptrap now. The Democrats have a message, but the message has no resonance beyond the Democratic Party. Their message is “Come Home America.”

Polls show Americans are dissatisfied with the condition of the country; but when they have to choose between a president who wants to fight our enemies abroad and the Democrats, most Americans will choose the Republicans. All the criticism from the Democrats over our war in Iraq and our war on terror amounts to being what an earlier president chided his war critics as, to wit: “Back Seat Drivers.” The president was Franklin D. Roosevelt.

R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. is founder and editor in chief of the American Spectator, a contributing editor to the New York Sun and an adjunct fellow at the Hudson Institute. He is author of “Madame Hillary: The Dark Road to the White House.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide