- The Washington Times - Saturday, August 19, 2006

CHICAGO (AP) — Democrats agreed to shake up tradition yesterday by wedging Nevada between Iowa’s leadoff caucuses and the New Hampshire primary in the 2008 presidential nominating calendar and adding South Carolina soon afterward.

The addition of Nevada’s caucuses and the South Carolina primary to a presidential calendar long dominated by Iowa and New Hampshire is intended to give a greater voice to Hispanics and blacks — minorities critical to Democrats’ success.

Nevada has a sizable Hispanic population while South Carolina has a high concentration of black voters. The early contests in those states will give Democrats more prominence in the Southeast and the Southwest, regions that tend to support Republicans.

Advocates of the plan passed on a voice vote by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) say it will force Democratic candidates for the White House to develop a broader message that extends beyond the concerns of voters in Iowa or New Hampshire.

But the altered schedule poses risks. New Hampshire, for example, is threatening to ignore the party lineup by moving its primary even earlier, despite the possibility that Democrats would punish candidates who campaign in states with schedules that violate party rules.

The plan would keep Iowa’s caucuses in their leadoff position Jan. 14. Nevada would follow with its own caucuses Jan. 19. New Hampshire would retain its status as the first-in-the-nation primary, with voting Jan. 22. South Carolina would hold its primary Jan. 29.

Eager to keep states from jumping in line, the DNC also passed enforcement rules that would punish candidates who campaign in states that ignore the party and set their own schedule. Some party members worry that would create an unseemly intraparty fight when Democrats can least afford it.

Under that plan, candidates who venture into states that ignore party rules would not get any delegates from those contests. But some DNC members were not sure how effective such a sanction would be, particularly if the states doing the leapfrogging are small and have few delegates to offer.

Others complain that the added contests in Nevada and South Carolina squeeze so many contests early in the nomination process that the party’s nominee could be determined by the beginning of February, before most states even get a chance to vote.

“You’re ceding authority to those four states,” Kathleen Sullivan, the chairman of the Democratic Party in New Hampshire and a member of the rules committee, said before yesterday’s meeting.

She made an unsuccessful plea yesterday to defeat the plan.

“By compressing Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina into 15 days, our candidates will not face the test of speaking to average voters about the issues that will matter in November 2008,” Miss Sullivan said. “Our nominee will be chosen by the end of January, a nominee who will be chosen by fewer than 500,000 voters. That is not democracy, that is not diversity.”

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2020 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide