- The Washington Times - Friday, August 4, 2006


Young workers, Wall Street, a couple of airlines and U.S. taxpayers could come out as winners in the pension changes made by Congress.

Some older employees, as well as truck drivers and construction workers hoping to retire early, might not fare as well.

The legislation passed by the Senate late Thursday and sent to the president would, if successful, prod companies to fund their pension plans properly and ensure that workers get the retirement benefits they deserve.

But the bill also reflects the reality that the traditional defined-benefit pension system is in decline, and the transition to new defined-contribution-style savings plans won’t be easy.

Here’s how some of the players in the legislation may be affected:


The 30,000 defined-benefit plans run by employers are now underfunded by $450 billion, and the bill requires plans to reach 100 percent funding levels in seven years. Seriously underfunded “at-risk” companies must contribute at an accelerated rate.

The American Benefits Council, which represents companies with traditional pension plans, said the bill was a “mixed bag” that promotes saving but could make funding requirements more unpredictable, giving plan sponsors thinking of freezing their plans another reason to.

The council’s vice president, Lynn Dudley, said the bill shifts saving responsibilities onto the individual by promoting 401(k) and other defined-contribution plans. “Defined-benefit plans were sacrificed in the process and for that we are disappointed.”

Frank McArdle of consultant Hewitt Associates, didn’t think the funding rules would of themselves contribute to more ditched plans. “We think in the end companies will figure out a way to work with them.”

The Congressional Budget Office concluded that companies will actually contribute less to their plans over the next few years as the new funding rules are phased in but will start making higher contributions in about five years.

Two companies pleased about the legislation are Delta and Northwest Airlines, which have filed for bankruptcy and have frozen their defined-benefit pension plans. Delta intends to terminate its pilots’ pension plan. Concerned that the two airlines would dump their plans, underfunded by a total of more than $10 billion, on the government, lawmakers gave them an extra 10 years beyond the seven years that other companies get to catch up.

General Motors and the UAW both came out in support of the bill after an earlier Senate provision that would have linked GM’s low credit rating to pension funding obligations was removed.


The bill, while stabilizing a shaky system, does not ensure there will be a defined-benefit plan in a worker’s retirement future. Half the workers in private industry have no pensions, and the legislation “doesn’t do anything for that,” said Karen Friedman of the Pension Rights Center.

A Hewitt Associates survey of 227 employers last year found 29 percent were likely to close participation in defined-benefit plans during the year.

The AARP said workers get shortchanged in a provision that adds legal certainty to cash-balance plans, “hybrids” currently in legal limbo because of a lawsuit against IBM filed by employees claiming age discrimination.

The Teamsters were also protesting provisions that would reduce early retirement benefits for workers in seriously underfunded multiemployer plans.

Experts agree that young workers in particular will be big winners from provisions promoting automatic enrollment into 401(k) programs.

The bill also encourages savings by making permanent a 2001 law allowing for increased annual contribution limits to individual retirement accounts, or IRAs. This would mainly benefit higher-income households.

All this will be a boon to Wall Street firms, which will see a rise in investors.


The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. has racked up deficits of $22.8 billion, mainly from taking over defunct steel and airline plans. The PBGC now operates on premiums and interest earnings, but the concern is that a rash of terminations could result in a massive taxpayer bailout.

But most experts discount comparisons to the bailout for the savings and loan industry in the 1980s, noting that PBGC liabilities can be stretched out over 30 or 40 years.

If the bill keeps the airline pensions afloat, the PBGC, and the taxpayer, come out winners.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide