- The Washington Times - Monday, December 18, 2006

NEW YORK (AP) — By studying blindfolded college students who crawled through grass to sniff out a chocolate-scented trail, scientists say they’ve found evidence of a human smelling ability that specialists thought was impossible.

The study indicates that the human brain compares information that it gets from each nostril for clues about where a smell is coming from. And it suggests that dogs, mice and other mammals do the same thing, contrary to what most scientists have thought.

People compare signals from each ear to locate the source of a noise. But the prevailing notion has been that mammals can’t follow the same strategy for smells, because their nostrils are too close together to get distinct signals.

“We debunked that,” said Noam Sobel of the University of California at Berkeley, who reported the new results yesterday with graduate student Jess Porter and others on the Web site of the journal Nature Neuroscience. The work will appear in the journal’s January issue.

The report isn’t the first to suggest the two-nostril idea. But Mr. Sobel and colleagues have now “opened the doors for full consideration of it,” said an scientist familiar with the work, neuroscientist Charles Wysocki of the Monell Chemical Senses Center in Philadelphia.

The new paper reports five experiments. One tracked tiny particles used in theatrical fog to show that each human nostril really does sample a distinct region in space.

But most of the paper focuses on what a group of undergraduate psychology students could do on a patch of lawn on the Berkeley campus.

One outdoor experiment was designed to see whether people could use just their noses to follow a 30-foot-long trail of chocolate scent, which traced a dogleg course through the grass.

The trail was created with scented twine. The 32 participants were blindfolded and equipped with thick gloves, kneepads and elbow pads to make sure they couldn’t see or feel it. They also wore earmuffs.

Before they began, they were shown a video of proper scent-tracking form, which requires putting the nose on the ground.

“People don’t really want to do that,” Mr. Porter said.

Two-thirds of the participants succeeded in following the scent. But when they tried it again with their noses plugged, nobody could do it.

Another experiment found that people got better with practice. Yet another experiment, with 14 participants, found that the volunteers did better if they used two nostrils than if one nostril was taped shut. They succeeded 66 percent of the time with two nostrils, compared with 36 percent with one nostril.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More

Click to Hide