- The Washington Times - Monday, December 4, 2006

LONDON — Prime Minister Tony Blair laid out plans yesterday for a new multibillion-dollar submarine-based nuclear arsenal, warning lawmakers that the future may hold threats from rogue regimes and state-sponsored terrorists.

In what is expected to be one of his last major acts as prime minister, Mr. Blair told the House of Commons that despite the end of the Cold War, potential threats were posed by North Korea, Iran and others.

“In these circumstances, it would be unwise and dangerous for Britain alone of any of the nuclear powers to give up its independent nuclear deterrent,” he said.

Mr. Blair said Britain would cut its stock of nuclear warheads from 200 to 160 — a move intended to make the proposal more acceptable to detractors within his own party. But he said any decision to reduce the nuclear-armed submarine fleet from four to three would be made only after a new vessel is designed. Mr. Blair said advisers had ruled out land- or air-based alternatives.

Mr. Blair also said a decision on whether Britain will build a new arsenal of warheads to replace current stocks — expected to last only until the 2020s — would not be made before 2009.

The existing submarine fleet will be phased out from 2022, defense officials said.

Britain’s conservative opposition leader David Cameron endorsed the new deterrent, though he urged options be kept open for a fourth submarine.

The replacement fleet would cost about $40 billion.

Mr. Blair said Britain would join in a U.S. program to extend the Trident D5 missile, currently used by both countries, until the early 2040s. President Bush has assured Mr. Blair that Britain would be included in designing a successor missile, defense officials said.

Mr. Blair told legislators that they would be asked to decide on the number of new submarines and a new missile design in the next Parliament after national elections expected in 2009.

Kate Hudson, chairwoman of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, said Iran and North Korea would see Mr. Blair’s decision as a vindication of their own aspirations.

At the submarine fleet’s naval base in Faslane, Scotland, about 100 people protested Mr. Blair’s plans.

Lawmakers will be asked to vote on the proposal by March, allowing three months for debate.

Britain’s first Trident submarine, the HMS Vanguard, went on a maiden patrol in December 1994.

Opponents of a replacement system — including nuclear-disarmament advocates — say the new fleet is likely to cost as much as $150.6 billion.

Liberal Democrats, Britain’s third-largest party, have argued that a decision could be put off until as late as 2014. The government says a decision is urgent because it will take up to 14 years to design, commission and build the submarines.

Menzies Campbell, leader of the Liberal Democrats, questioned the timing of the decision.

“Is this about Britain’s interest or your legacy?” he asked Mr. Blair in the House of Commons.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide