- The Washington Times - Thursday, December 7, 2006

VIENNA, Austria — The poisoning death of former Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko has turned the world spotlight on polonium. But other potentially deadly radioactive substances are also around in smoke detectors and other household, industrial or hospital items.

Normally, they are securely shielded or locked away. And like polonium-210, some of the most common are not dangerous unless eaten or inhaled, which safeguards normally prevent.

Still, the Litvinenko case showed the possibilities for misuse. Scotland Yard said Wednesday it was treating his Nov. 23 death in London as murder.

In the United States, loopholes allow just about anyone to buy radioactive material, either privately or by masquerading as a company with legitimate uses for americium, thorium, tritium and similar potentially hazardous substances.

Earlier this year, a report for the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee found that “with ease, investigators purchased, received and transported radioactive sources” into the United States from Mexico and Canada.

U.S. government officials posing as employees of a fictitious company were able to “purchase a small quantity of … radioactive sources from a commercial source,” according to the report by the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress.

That shows that “anyone can purchase small quantities of radioactive sources for stockpiling because suppliers are not required to exercise any due diligence in determining whether the buyer has a legitimate use for the radioactive sources,” the report said.

Although polonium would be an unusual weapon, it is less exotic than it appears. Like other toxic radioactive substances, polonium has a variety of domestic, medical and industrial uses.

Traces of polonium-210 are found in anti-static brushes, though far less than the estimated 3,000 microcuries needed to kill someone. Larger quantities — more than enough to kill — are used in some specialized anti-static fans.

United Nuclear, a company in Sandia Park, N.M., sells it online in tiny amounts of 0.1 microcuries exempt from U.S. federal licensing restrictions.

In a note on its Web site, www.unitednuclear.com/isotopes.htm, company founder Bob Lazar says it’s not a practical poison: You would need 15,000 orders from him, more than $1 million worth, to potentially harm anyone, and each order comes electroplated on the inside of the eye of a needle.

More readily available is americium, a gamma and alpha particle-emitting byproduct of decayed plutonium, commonly thought to be lethal when ingested.

Americium-241 is a key component of many home smoke detectors, acting as a sort of conductor that sets off an alarm when disrupted by smoke. It is safely sealed, and someone looking to misuse it would need to crack open about 5,000 detectors to isolate the 1 gram of the substance thought needed to seriously sicken or kill.

Still, “if you took enough material from smoke detectors, you could make someone very sick — or worse,” said Dr. Andrew Butterfass, director of emergency medicine at Cabrini Medical Center in New York, who emphasized that cases of radiation poisoning are “extremely rare.”

Some brands of gas lantern mantles still contain traces of thorium-232, which emits light when burned by the gas and can kill if ingested.

Other toxic radioactive sources can be found in many clocks and watches, some ceramics, antique glassware and glass lenses. The quantities are so minute that they are not dangerous unless amassed by someone seeking to do harm.

Hospitals and clinics worldwide, meanwhile, have untold thousands of potentially hazardous radioactive sources in diagnostic equipment or devices used to treat cancer. Irradiation equipment for sterilization also is found in hospitals, as well as in the food and agriculture industries.

Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the Vienna U.N. nuclear monitor, has described industrial equipment as containing “potentially lethal quantities of radioactive material.”

An IAEA report warns of the risks posed if “a radioactive source becomes out of control and unshielded or dispersed as the result of an accident or a malevolent act.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide