- The Washington Times - Thursday, February 16, 2006

For weeks, civilized observers around the world have been astonished by the dispendious angers vented by indignant young Muslims. These young indignados have listened to the counsel of their venerable leaders in government and the mosques. They have noted the intolerable provocations of the unbelievers. Finally, they have taken to the streets and city squares to burn flags, bash passersby, rush the cops, and — from what I have observed on the TV news — take a swing or two at each other. Their righteous anger could be contained only so long.

Taking it all in, I can only wonder: How long will it be before such scenes erupt in the streets and squares of America? Listening to their indignant leaders, witnessing the daily provocations within our society, how long will it be before this country’s young Democrats give themselves over to the fiery passions that their own mullahs are stoking?

America’s Angry Left, as it is called, can only take so much. Then, vavoom. Our Angry Left’s own indignados will be out on the street, haranguing the Republican Congress, chanting anti-Halliburton jingles, and burning three-piece suits. Wal-Marts will be stormed. Former Vice President Al Gore will be called back from Saudi Arabia to mollify the masses.

Doubtless you heard about his oratory at the celebrated Jeddah Economic Forum. There he told the assembled sheiks and mullahs, gentlemen and ladi… well, there were no ladies. At any rate al-Gore told the assembled that the Bush administration has been committing “terrible abuses and it’s wrong.” The abuses, said the former vice president, involved Arabs who after September 11, 2001, were “indiscriminately rounded up, often on minor charges of overstaying a visa… and held in conditions that were just unforgivable.”

Mr. Gore bids fair to become the Muqtada al-Sadr of America’s Angry Left. Savor his recent vituperations. He has called our suave president a “moral coward” allied with “digital brownshirts.” He refers to Abu Ghraib prison as “the Bush Gulag”; and, forgetting the discrepancies of his former boss, he calls President Bush “the most dishonest president since Richard Nixon.”

Of course, Mr. Gore is not without competition among the party’s elders. Dr. Howard Dean’s rage is ceaseless. Just the other day he apprised CNN that “This is probably the most corrupt administration we’ve had since maybe ever and certainly since Harding, I would guess.” Former President Jimmy Carter is angrier still. He could not even stifle his anger during the funeral of Coretta Scott King — and with Mr. Bush accompanied by his father sitting nearby.

There Mr. Carter suggested racial prejudice accounted for the slow governmental response to Hurricane Katrina. Alluding to the present controversy over the Bush administration’s National Security Agency wiretapping of suspected terrorists, he lamented the long-ago federal surveillance of the Kings. Predictably, he was careful not to mention that surveillance was perpetrated by Democrats.

In recalling his dedication as Georgia governor of a portrait of Martin Luther King Jr. in 1974, Mr. Carter was also careful not to mention that early in his political career he had courted the Georgia Ku Klux Klan. Instead he recalled that outside those dedication rites there were “chanting members of the Ku Klux Klan, who had too much support from other Americans.” Well maybe, but the hooded morons’ support had declined sufficiently for you, Mr. Carter, to look elsewhere for votes.

Yes, with all this moral indignation pouring forth from the Democratic elders, how long will it be before their listeners take to the streets? Already the Internet resounds with the young furiosos’ enraged responses. Can it be long before they march? And when they do they will be more dangerous than any Arab street demonstration, for America’s Angry Left includes its womenfolk. Boy, are they angry. Possibly when the mullahs and potentates of Araby see the incomparable wrathfulness of America’s left-wing women, they will revise their thinking on male-only street demonstrations. Tantrums thrown by women can be very persuasive.

R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. is founder and editor in chief of the American Spectator, a contributing editor to the New York Sun, and an adjunct scholar at the Hudson Institute. His latest book is “Madame Hillary: The Dark Road to the White House.”


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide