- The Washington Times - Tuesday, February 21, 2006

Visits key lab in Colorado after rushing $5 million to restore jobs

GOLDEN, Colo. (Reuters) — President Bush called yesterday for tapping renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power to contend with surging energy costs.

Mr. Bush also told employees at a key laboratory for renewable-energy research that he regretted “mixed signals” that led the Colorado facility to announce job cuts earlier this month because of budget cuts.

He visited the National Renewable Energy Laboratory a day after his administration rushed the transfer of $5 million to the lab to enable it to restore the jobs and resolve what could have been an embarrassing situation.

Democrats had cited the job cuts as a sign of lack of real commitment by the government to energy independence initiatives that Mr. Bush, a former oil company executive, announced with great fanfare in his State of the Union speech on Jan. 31.

The stop in Golden was the last on a two-day, three-state tour on which Mr. Bush pushed his new energy approach.

“I have spent a lot of time worrying about the national security implications of being addicted to oil,” Mr. Bush said. “The demand for oil is rising faster than the supply of oil. Any time that happens it creates the conditions for what could be price disruption.”

In a congressional election year when Democrats are hoping to challenge Republican dominance in both houses of Congress, soaring costs for gasoline and home heating are pinching Americans’ budgets.

The energy initiative is part of Mr. Bush’s attempt to show that he and fellow Republicans are addressing that issue. This week, oil prices rose above $60 a barrel after militant attacks in Nigeria, the world’s eighth-largest crude exporter.

Many environmental groups say Mr. Bush has paid insufficient attention to developing alternative-energy sources during the first five years of his presidency.

“Funding for renewable technologies has been gutted since 2001, and only recently has been made a policy priority,” Greenpeace said in a statement.

That group and others have criticized Mr. Bush for refusing to back stricter fuel-efficiency standards for vehicles that they say are needed for significant reductions in gasoline demand.

Although the Bush administration has required a small boost in efficiency standards for light trucks, environmental groups say more stringent requirements are needed.

Dave Hamilton, an energy specialist at the Sierra Club environmental group, said an energy bill Mr. Bush signed in August was a “missed opportunity” to have boosted alternative-fuels research funds further.

He said the president’s latest energy initiatives were “baby steps in the right direction.”

Addressing the issue of the jobs that had just been restored at the lab, Mr. Bush said, “I recognize that there has been some … let me say, mixed signals when it comes to funding.

“Our mutual desire is to clear up any discrepancies in funding, and I think we’ve cleaned up those discrepancies.”

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide