- The Washington Times - Thursday, February 23, 2006

ASSOCIATED PRESS

Who’s in charge of security at U.S. seaports?

There’s no simple answer to that question — a critical part of the debate over a United Arab Emirates firm that is looking to operate terminals in six U.S. ports.

Responsibility for security is spread among government agencies: the Coast Guard, Customs and Border Protection, terminal operators, and state and local port authorities.

The Department of Homeland Security said more than a year ago that confusion about responsibility had delayed a cargo security plan.

“During the two years since DHS was established, this has frequently led to questions of ‘who’s in charge?’” said a draft of the plan, released in December 2004.

Even now, said Sen. Daniel K. Inouye, Hawaii Democrat, the Bush administration doesn’t take port security seriously.

“It has consistently submitted inadequate funding requests and has routinely missed critical security deadlines that were required by law,” Mr. Inouye said.

The administration says it has strengthened port security since the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, pointing to increased funding and new security technology.

Customs and Border Protection oversees the cargo that arrives in more than 20,000 shipping containers that pass through U.S. ports daily.

The Coast Guard approves security plans for 10,000 ships and 5,000 port facilities. Since July 1, 2004, the agency has been responsible for ensuring those plans are carried out.

The nation’s larger ports have dozens of separate facilities within them, including oil refineries, warehouses, fuel farms, power plants and factories.

The terminal operator is responsible for security at its own terminal and the area within the port where cargo is loaded, unloaded or transferred, according to the Department of Homeland Security.

UAE-based Dubai Ports World would operate some of the terminals at a half-dozen of the nation’s largest seaports: Baltimore, Philadelphia, Miami, New Orleans, New York and Newark, N.J.

“They’re required to have a security plan,” said Dennis Murphy, former customs director at the Port of Norfolk and former Homeland Security Department spokesman.

The plan has to include security measures such as lighting, fencing, locks and background checks on employees, Mr. Murphy said.

“They have to know who the people are who they’re hiring,” he said.

A fact sheet from the Homeland Security Department said the “people working on the docks” and security personnel would not change under the pending deal.

Mr. Murphy said the entire supply chain is scrutinized by several people — including the buyer, the seller and the shipper as well as federal officials — who want to ensure cargo moves where it’s supposed to.

“It’s an elaborate ballet of information and machinery,” he said. “You don’t mess around. If you divert a container here and there, there are investigators who will crawl all over your personal life if they think anything is hinky.”


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide