- The Washington Times - Monday, February 6, 2006

It was a big week for Republican leaders. On Jan. 31, Ben Bernanke was sworn in as Federal Reserve chairman and Samuel Alito was sworn in as the 110th Supreme Court justice. On Feb. 2, House Republicans elected John Boehner of Ohio as their new majority leader. And on the day Mr. Bernanke and Justice Alito were sworn in, George W. Bush delivered his fifth State of the Union address to Congress.

The chief focus was on the State of the Union. There were two halves, separate but unequal. Mr. Bush spent the first half vigorously defending his handling of Iraq, as he has since November, and sending messages to Iran’s rulers and people.

That nation, he said, is “now held hostage by a small clerical elite that is isolating and repressing its people,” and that regime must not be allowed to gain nuclear weapons.

In contrast, he hailed the people of Iran and said “our nation hopes one day to be the closest of friends with a free and democratic Iran.” Fine words — if backed by vigorous efforts to encourage and aid those who seek freedom there.

Mr. Bush also defended vigorously the National Security Agency’s surveillance of communications between suspected al Qaeda terrorists abroad and persons in the United States.

It is conventional wisdom in much of the mainstream media and among many Democrats that Iraq and the NSA program are politically damaging to Republicans. Mr. Bush and his chief political strategist, Karl Rove, clearly disagree.

In a speech to the Republican National Committee earlier last month, Mr. Rove insisted national security will be a central theme for Republicans this year, and Mr. Bush’s speech indicates he will take the offensive on that issue.

Democrats would like to take national security off the table. But rather than stand and applaud Mr. Bush on the NSA surveillance, they almost all sat glumly in their chairs, hostages to the left-wing blogosphere and billionaire contributors whose furious and often obscene denunciations of Mr. Bush and the war on terrorism set the tone for the whole party.

In the second half of the speech, on domestic issues, Mr. Bush addressed issues that threaten to demoralize his conservative base — spending, immigration and scandal. He advanced proposals designed to win bipartisan support — an Advanced Energy Initiative to address our supposed addiction to oil, science and math teacher training, and portable health insurance coverage.

These are not likely to trigger the stonewalling opposition that greeted Mr. Bush’s call for individual investment accounts in Social Security last year (although expanded health savings accounts will). They give Mr. Bush some basis to claim he is seeking bipartisanship. “Our differences cannot be allowed to harden into anger,” he said early in the speech — and if Democrats respond in anger, as they so often do, they can be portrayed as a party not ready to govern.

Conservatives complain, with some justification, Mr. Bush is detouring from the conservative path. He is at least trying to change the conversation. But the other Republicans who rose in prominent positions last week had careers that remind us that path is long and progress is being made despite some detours.

In the 1980s, Ben Bernanke was an economics professor at Stanford and Princeton. Now he runs the Fed. John Roberts and Samuel Alito in the 1980s worked in obscure corners of the Reagan administration. Now they wear the robes of justices of the Supreme Court, where they join Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, who had higher posts in the Reagan government.

John Boehner was an Ohio legislator in the 1980s and was first elected to the House in 1990, the year of the House bank scandal, and has never got a single earmark for his district. But as chairman of the Education Committee, he proved himself an able manager of both partisan bills and of bipartisan legislation, on education and pensions.

These men are part of a long march through institutions. When Mr. Boehner started off in Ohio, Democrats had a stranglehold on state politics. Justices Roberts and Alito in law school encountered few conservative professors; now, there is a substantial body of conservative jurisprudence. When Mr. Bernanke was an undergraduate, Keynesianism was still regnant; now, the economics professor has much greater respect for free markets.

Mr. Bush’s staying the course on national security and detour on domestic policy may or may not produce the Republican victory in November his strategists are so confident of. But conservative ideas now have deep institutional roots.

Michael Barone is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide