- The Washington Times - Saturday, January 14, 2006


A federal appeals court has refused to exempt two of the District’s top police officials from a lawsuit filed on behalf of nearly 400 people who were corralled at a city park and arrested during protests at the World Bank-International Monetary Fund annual meeting in 2002.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals Friday affirmed a trial judge’s ruling that said Metropolitan Police Assistant Chief Peter Newsham can be sued for violating the constitutional rights of the people who were arrested Sept. 27, 2002.

The panel said it could not determine whether police Chief Charles H. Ramsey deserved immunity as a public official because it is not clear whether he knew what had happened in the park before his arrival.

Chief Newsham ordered police officers to cordon off Pershing Park, about two blocks from the White House, after he observed some protesters committing acts of vandalism.

None of the vandals ever was identified.

In addition, police failed to give two warnings to the crowd to disperse — as required by department regulation — before erecting the cordon and making arrests.

The 386 persons in the park were charged with failing to obey an officer.

“Undisputed evidence reveals that Newsham arrested an undifferentiated mass of people on the basis of crimes committed by a handful of individuals who were never identified,” Judge Harry Edwards wrote in the unanimous decision.

“No reasonable officer in Newsham’s position could have believed that probable cause existed to order the sudden arrest of every individual in Pershing Park,” Judge Edwards wrote.

Chief Ramsey acknowledged that he “tacitly approved” Chief Newsham’s arrest plan.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide