- The Washington Times - Sunday, January 15, 2006


The dried-out wooden pilings beneath Lewis Lloyd’s multimillion-dollar Beacon Hill town house were rotting out from under him.

“You could stick a screwdriver in up to the handle,” said the 67-year-old retired media executive.

Groundwater levels have been dropping for years in some Boston neighborhoods, exposing the wooden supports that have propped up the city for more than a century. Without the protecting embrace of water, the pilings quickly rot, posing expensive problems for property owners.

The water level below Mr. Lloyd’s house — in the same affluent neighborhood that Democratic Sen. John Kerry and former General Electric boss Jack Welch call home — was 2 feet below the tops of his pilings.

Had he done nothing, he risked major structural damage. So Mr. Lloyd paid $250,000 to “underpin” the five-story building, a job that entails digging up the basement, cutting off the rotted tops of the pilings, and replacing them with steel beams wrapped in concrete. Insurance doesn’t cover any of it.

“I didn’t think it was going to cost as much as it did,” he said.

Much of the city — including the Back Bay and parts of downtown Boston — is built on tidal flats that were filled in during the 19th century to create neighborhoods that would house the city’s exploding population.

Because the landfill alone couldn’t support the buildings, pilings the shape and length of telephone poles were driven down until they hit solid clay. The foundations then were built on top of the pilings. Structures as big as the imposing Trinity Church in Copley Square were built in this manner. One estimate puts the value of properties sitting atop pilings citywide at $10 billion.

The pilings can last hundreds of years — as they have in some European cities — as long as they remain submerged. But leaks in underground infrastructure, such as sewer lines, subway tunnels and garages, have lowered the groundwater level, exposing the pilings.

Above ground, streets, sidewalks and parking lots redirect rainwater into storm sewers instead of being absorbed into the ground.

Milwaukee has experienced similar troubles in its downtown, as have Amsterdam, Oslo and Stockholm.

“But there was no place that was filled as extensively as Boston,” said Jim Lambrechts, an engineering professor at Wentworth Institute of Technology who is studying the problem.

Historians worry about the long-term effect on the city’s architectural heritage.

“If nothing were done, a substantial part of the housing stock of the city of Boston and the history of Boston would be threatened,” said Elliott Laffer, executive director of the Boston Groundwater Trust, a city-funded organization that monitors water levels. “People come to Boston to look at and study our historic buildings. Nobody comes here for the weather.”

Neighborhood activists began pressuring elected officials after several Chinatown homes had to be torn down in the 1980s because of rotted pilings, and they now are getting some of what they want.

In September, eight city and state agencies accused of contributing to the problem with their leaky pipes and transit tunnels agreed to find and fix the breaches. The agreement is nonbinding and assumes no responsibility. Separately, the Groundwater Trust is overseeing the installation of 800 monitoring wells across the city, a process that is now nearly complete.

In an odd contrast to the pumping of water from New Orleans streets after Hurricane Katrina, the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) is paying $35,000 a year to pump water back into the ground in the city’s South End, where its Orange Line subway tunnel is thought to be leaking.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide