- The Washington Times - Sunday, January 8, 2006


Today’s horror movies are more likely to be dripping with blood than irony, with films like “Wolf Creek,” the “Saw” series and “Hostel” (which opened Friday) representing a return to their grisly, low-budget ‘70s roots.

While the “Scream” trilogy grossed hundreds of millions of dollars in the late 1990s with characters who winked at the camera in playful mockery of the genre’s conventions, horror flicks like “Hostel,” Eli Roth’s follow-up to his gory 2003 debut “Cabin Fever,” will show you a character whose eye is dangling from its socket after a long afternoon of torture.

“Self-referential, ironic humor ran its course,” says Mr. Roth, a 33-year-old writer-director who grew up loving the graphic slasher movies of the 1970s and ‘80s and also cites Asian cinema as an influence.

“Kevin Williamson did it brilliantly,” he says, referring to the writer of the original “Scream.” “At the same time ‘Scream’ was huge, ‘Dawson’s Creek’ was [television’s] most popular show. … People got tired of that. That was the gimmick. Even Kevin Williamson got tired of that.

Lions Gate Films apparently thinks so, too, having released several of the really grisly horror movies that have come out in the past few years: Rob Zombie’s “House of 1,000 Corpses” and its sequel, “The Devil’s Rejects,” about a family of redneck serial killers; “Saw” and “Saw II,” about a kidnapper who torments his victims with elaborate mind games; the French “High Tension,” about two young women who are terrorized in the woods; and now “Hostel,” which follows a trio of twentysomething guys on a European vacation that begins as an orgy of sex and drugs and descends into brutal, bloody sadism.

Lions Gate President Tom Ortenberg says this particular kind of horror movie is alluring because “it’s got touches of realism that audiences today can relate to.

“We’re never going to outspend the competition in the marketing or production of a movie. Were not going to blow people away with the latest million-dollar special effects. We’re never going to do that better than the studios,” Mr. Ortenberg says.

“What we can do as well or better than the studios, perhaps in retro fashion, is a realistic, gut-level, visceral horror movie that doesn’t rely on special effects, and audiences are responding to that.”

While they’re not exactly critical favorites — the first “Saw” received only 45 percent positive reviews on the Rotten Tomatoes Web site, with “Saw II” earning just 35 percent positive reviews — these movies can be enormously profitable. “Saw” had a $1 million budget and grossed $55 million-plus; the sequel cost $4 million and grossed nearly $87 million.

“Our economic model is much different than the studios,” Mr. Ortenberg says. “When a Rob Zombie movie like ‘The Devil’s Rejects’ grosses $17 million, or Eli Roth’s first movie grosses $20 million, that’s very successful for us.”

Meanwhile, the Weinstein Co. is in theaters with the low-budget “Wolf Creek,” about a madman who targets tourists in the Australian outback. Harvey and Bob Weinstein released the star-studded “Scream” trilogy and several other horror movies under the Dimension Films branch of their former company, Miramax.

Bob Weinstein, who ran Dimension, bought “Wolf Creek” for $3.5 million a month before it screened at last year’s Sundance Film Festival because “it was very hard-edge, very real,” he says. The company released it on Christmas Day amid the family films and Oscar contenders.

Paul Dergarabedian, president of the box-office tracker Exhibitor Relations, believes this kind of graphic fare is making a comeback because “when people want to be scared, they really want to be scared.”

“With video games and all the entertainment options, it really takes a lot to impress audiences today,” Mr. Dergarabedian says. “The level of violence and gore cannot be too intense for a lot of people. Horror fans in particular are very keen on seeing the most intense, violent images they can.

“Some might say it’s a reflection on society, how desensitized we’ve become to violence,” he added. “I still believe people know the difference. It’s a vicarious thrill. I look at it more as entertainment: You can have that fear but in a safe environment.”

The trend toward old-school terror has spread to television with Showtime’s “Masters of Horror” series, in which veteran directors including Tobe Hooper, John Landis, Dario Argento and Takashi Miike have created one-hour original programs.

Joe Dante’s contribution, titled “Homecoming,” takes traditional zombie movie imagery and turns it into an indictment of the war in Iraq: Soldiers return from the dead not to eat people’s brains but to vote the president out of office who sent them into battle.

As for the renaissance of grisly horror, Mr. Dante says: “Everything goes in cycles.”

And more gore is on the horizon — specifically, remakes of the classic movies that provided the inspiration for this new wave in the first place. “When a Stranger Calls” is scheduled for release in February, with “The Hills Have Eyes” (from “High Tension” writer-director Alexandre Aja) following in March.

In October, expect a “Texas Chainsaw Massacre” prequel — there’s already been a remake of the iconic film, which grossed $80 million in 2003 — as well as “Saw 3.” Autumn also brings “Grind House” from Mr. Weinstein, in which horror aficionados Robert Rodriguez and Quentin Tarantino join forces to co-direct. John Jarratt, the serial killer from “Wolf Creek,” is the star.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide