- The Washington Times - Tuesday, July 11, 2006

ASSOCIATED PRESS

The Senate moved yesterday toward opening the way for Americans to import prescription drugs from Canada, seeking to ease a ban on cheaper medicine crossing the border.

The proposal, which was approved 68-32, would create a Canadian loophole in a Food and Drug Administration ban on importing prescription medicine to the United States. It was offered as part of a $31.7 billion Homeland Security Department spending blueprint for the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1.

The department’s Customs and Border Protection bureau began aggressively seizing Tamiflu, Viagra and other incoming medications at borders in November. Prescription drugs — even those manufactured in the United States — are generally sold at cheaper prices in Canada.

“We should demand that [Customs and Border Protection] focus on the true priority that we face on the war on terror,” said Sen. David Vitter, Louisiana Republican, of efforts to secure U.S. borders. “Stripping small amounts of prescription drugs from the hands of seniors … that should not be a priority.”

Mr. Vitter’s plan, which was embraced by Democrats, specifically would prohibit Customs and Border Protection from stopping people with doctors’ prescriptions for FDA-approved drugs from bringing the medicine into this country from Canada.

But Republican leaders vociferously opposed the plan for fear, they said, the drugs could be unsafe for consumers — or even present a terror risk.

Sen. Judd Gregg, New Hampshire Republican, said the proposal was an attempt to push the FDA into reversing itself while “creating a massive hole on our capacity to secure our borders and protect ourselves.”

“If I were a creative terrorist, I would say to myself, ‘Hey, listen, all I’ve got to do is produce a can here that says ‘Lipitor’ on it, make it look like the original Lipitor bottle, which isn’t too hard to do, fill it with anthrax,’ ” Mr. Gregg said.

Lipitor is a cholesterol-lowering drug.

Aides said the drug-importation plan was likely to be stripped out of the legislation, as it has been in past years, whenever it got to a conference of House and Senate lawmakers who will negotiate the final version. The administration also has opposed efforts to loosen the restrictions.

Two House spending bills this year, to fund the Homeland Security and Agriculture departments in 2007, include the drug-importation plan, said Kirstin Brost, spokeswoman for Rep. David R. Obey of Wisconsin, the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee.

The House has approved efforts to import drugs in six spending bills over the past seven years, Miss Brost said, but the idea so far has survived the conference only once. In that year, 2000, the plan was eventually dropped because it was written in a way that couldn’t be carried out, Miss Brost said.

While importing drugs ito the United States is illegal, the FDA generally has not stopped small amounts purchased for personal use. Still, the FDA says it cannot guarantee the safety of imported drugs.

Customs and Border Protection began seizing controlled substances in September 2004, and expanded that operation last November to include noncontrolled substances. The Bush administration has opposed efforts to loosen the restrictions.

Since November, customs officials have seized an estimated 34,000 packages of drugs coming into the country, although the medications’ origins were not known, according to data provided by Sen. Bill Nelson, Florida Democrat.

He said of the Senate legislation, “This is going to ensure that Americans, especially the frail, elderly, or those with debilitating conditions, are going to be able to at least have a chance of affording the medications that they need.”


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide