- The Washington Times - Thursday, July 20, 2006

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — A federal judge temporarily stopped construction on a $320 million irrigation project yesterday, ruling that the enterprise could disturb the habitat of a woodpecker that might or might not be extinct.

The first purported sighting of the ivory-billed woodpecker in the area was in 2004, but more than 100 volunteers and researchers who spent weeks last winter trying to find evidence of the bird’s existence came back empty-handed.

Still, U.S. District Judge William R. Wilson said that, for purposes of the lawsuit brought by environmental groups, he had to presume the woodpecker exists in the area. Federal agencies may have violated the Endangered Species Act by not studying the habitat fully, he said.

“When an endangered species is allegedly jeopardized, the balance of hardships and public interest tips in favor of the protected species. Here there is evidence,” he wrote, that the ivory-billed woodpecker may be jeopardized.

The National Wildlife Federation and the Arkansas Wildlife Federation had sued the Army Corps of Engineers, arguing that the project would kill trees that house the birds and that noise from a pumping station would cause them stress.

Scientists had thought the woodpecker was extinct until a kayaker said he saw one in early 2004 near the White River in the big woods of eastern Arkansas. The report caused a sensation in scientific circles and has attracted people from all across the world who hope to see the bird.

Ornithologists caught on tape a flicker of what they thought was the bird but announced this year they couldn’t prove conclusively that the woodpecker still lives.

The Army Corps of Engineers began building the Grand Prairie Irrigation Project last year, about 14 miles from where the bird reportedly was spotted.

Aquifers beneath eastern Arkansas soybean, cotton and rice fields are being depleted, and a federal court in a separate case last year said that the main aquifer used for farming will be depleted by 2015 if water isn’t conserved and that the region would suffer significant economic hardship if it ran dry.

Workers have started on a pump station to draw 158 billion gallons from the White River per year. A Justice Department lawyer said this year that a one-month delay would cost the corps as much as $264,000, and that a six-month wait would cost $3 million.

The judge said yesterday that the corps and the Interior Department must conduct further studies before proceeding.

The agencies must evaluate any ivory-bill nests and forage sites within 21/2 miles of the construction project. They also must identify and inspect for nesting, roosting and foraging all trees a foot or more across in the areas to be affected by eventual changes in water levels, Judge Wilson said.

The corps had conducted a study showing that the project would not significantly harm the woodpecker’s habitat, but the environmental groups that filed the suit said the study was too narrow and did not comply with the Endangered Species Act.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2021 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide