- The Washington Times - Saturday, July 29, 2006

One of the great ironies of our time is that today’s parents, with more professional resources at their disposal than ever before, are experiencing more and greater problems in the area of discipline than their grandparents even thought possible.

Once upon a not-so-very-long-ago time, children were mischievous. They tried to get away with what they thought they could when adults weren’t looking. Too many of today’s children are surly, rude, disrespectful, ill-mannered, petulant and openly defiant.

The nature of the child has not changed in 50 years, so the problem must lie with changes in how parents are going about their job. Indeed, today’s “parenting” bears little resemblance to the child rearing of 50-plus years ago.

Even if one overlooks such things as working moms, day care and the ubiquity of the single-parent family, the differences between then and now are considerable.

In the good old days (and make no mistake about it, though certainly not idyllic, they were far better), parents concentrated their energies on shaping character. They were intent upon raising children who embodied the three R’s of respect, responsibility and resourcefulness.

Today’s parents, by contrast, seek to raise children who possess high self-esteem, which researchers have found is correlated highly with low tolerance for frustration, low self-control and a sense of personal entitlement. Be careful what you wish for, eh?

Yesterday’s parents valued good manners. Today’s parents value skills and accomplishments, especially academic ones. Along with many if not most of my peers, I entered first grade not knowing my ABCs. My first-grade teacher taught 50 children. She had far fewer discipline problems than a first-grade teacher today who, with an aide, teaches 20.

Furthermore, those 50 children — none of whom were held back because of late birthdays — exited first grade reading better than today’s first-grade grads, many of whom knew their ABCs before their fourth birthdays.

Yesterday’s parents didn’t much care what grades their youngsters brought home as long as the grades reflected their children’s best efforts. Mothers didn’t help their children with homework, nor did they challenge teachers who reported misbehavior. If a child misbehaved in school, the teacher’s report was accepted, and the child got into double trouble at home.

Yesterday’s parents understood that one could not be a good-enough parent to prevent one’s child from behaving despicably on any given day. Today’s parents seem to think that despicable behavior reflects bad parenting; therefore, their children are incapable of behaving despicably.

In those better days, when you misbehaved, your parents tried to make you feel guilty. Many of today’s parents try to discipline their children without causing guilt, not realizing that the anticipation of guilt is the best preventive of misbehavior, not the anticipation of “negative consequences.”

Most people in my generation will testify that knowing you disappointed your parents was the worst consequence of all — but then, we were not on pedestals. The pedestals were occupied by our parents.

Needless to say, today’s parents are more concerned about disappointing their children than their children are about disappointing them. It’s that pedestal thing.

The bottom line: You cannot raise children in two entirely different ways and arrive at the same outcome. I sometimes ask parents, “Who would you rather be raising, you or your child?” Eight out of 10 answer along these lines: “Oh, that’s a no-brainer, John. Me, of course.”

Unfortunately, that’s not the right answer.

Family psychologist John Rosemond answers parents’ questions on his Web site (www.rosemond.com).

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide