- The Washington Times - Friday, July 7, 2006

When is a “secret” not a secret? When The New York Times decides, in the interest of saving its old gray hide, that it is not.

On June 22, the paper trumpeted its expose of “a secret Bush administration program” to track terror finances. The banking program, reporters Eric Lichtblau and James Risen made unmistakably clear, was a “closely held secret.” The Page One story referred to the secret nature of the program no less than eight times. A Times-produced Web video featuring Mr. Lichtblau promoted a brief interview in which he “reveal[ed] a secret Bush administration program to access financial records.”

But by July 2, smarting from the public backlash against its blabbermouth coverage, the Times crew was backpedaling faster than circus monkeys on barrels hurtling over Niagara Falls. Suddenly, the “secret” was no secret at all.

Everybody who is anybody has known about the secret program all along, silly. New York Times ombudsman Byron Calame’s belated defense of the Times’ expose of the monitoring of the SWIFT banking program contained this revealing passage:

“There was a significant question as to how secret the [monitoring of the SWIFT banking program] was after five years. ‘Hundreds, if not thousands, of people know about this,’ [Executive Editor Bill] Keller claimed he was told by an official who talked to him on condition of anonymity.”

“Hundreds, if not thousands, of people” have known about the program before the Times blabbed about it. Well, there’s a scoop. So, why wasn’t this reported in the original story and reflected in the original, front-page headline?

There was no printed follow-up from lapdog Mr. Calame about Mr. Keller’s assertion, which goes a good bit further than the claim by Times’ apologists Richard Clarke and Roger Cressey. That mind-reading duo wrote in a Times op-ed claiming terrorists already assumed their financial transactions were monitored. Mr. Calame curiously neglected to note that Mr. Keller’s claim contradicted both the tone and facts presented in the Times’ initial coverage by Messrs. Lichtblau and Risen.

Which is just as well, since Mr. Lichtblau himself is now contradicting his own story, too. On CNN’s “Reliable Sources,” facing withering criticism from talk radio host Hugh Hewitt, Mr. Lichtblau blustered:

“When you have senior Treasury Department officials going before Congress, publicly talking about how they are tracing and cutting off money to terrorists, weeks and weeks before our story ran. USA Today, the biggest circulation in the country, the lead story on their front page four days before our story ran was the terrorists know their money is being traced, and they are moving it into — outside of the banking system into unconventional means. It is by no means a secret.” (Emphasis added.)

Hmm. What was that headline over Mr. Lichtblau’s story again? Oh, yeah: “Bank data sifted in secret by U.S. to block terror.” Meanwhile, finance regulators and top government officials in Belgium (who apparently aren’t among the “hundreds, if not thousands” who knew about the program) have ordered a probe into SWIFT, which is regulated by the Belgian central bank and answers to Belgian law. Bush-undermining Eurowheedlers are launching a debate in parliament over the program next week, and a private human-rights lobbying group has filed formal complaints against the SWIFT banking consortium in 32 countries.

Lesson No. 1: Never trust the Times’ headlines.

Lesson No. 2: Never trust what’s printed under the Times’ headlines.

Lesson No. 3: Never trust what comes out of the mouths of the Times’ editors and reporters.

Avoid the newspaper of wreckage, and help keep American safe.

Michelle Malkin is a nationally syndicated columnist and author of the new book “Unhinged: Exposing Liberals Gone Wild.”


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide