- The Washington Times - Monday, June 12, 2006


A prosecutor said yesterday that a Bush administration official chose the interests of lobbyist Jack Abramoff over those of the public and should be convicted of covering up what he had done.

David Safavian, the former chief of staff at the General Services Administration (GSA), “was trying to hide a secret, inappropriate and unethical relationship with Mr. Abramoff,” prosecutor Nathaniel Edmonds told a federal jury in final arguments.

Mr. Edmonds said that every public official has “moments of truth” in which he can act ethically or unethically and that Mr. Safavian failed the test by lying to the GSA’s ethics officer, the agency’s office of inspector general and a Senate committee.

Mr. Safavian supplied the lobbyist with information about government land in Maryland and the Old Post Office in downtown Washington about the time he accepted a weeklong golfing excursion from Abramoff to Scotland and London.

Defense attorney Barbara Van Gelder said her client was an honest public servant who told investigators the truth and had no motive to lie.

In the first trial in the Abramoff influence-peddling scandal, Mr. Safavian is accused of five counts of lying to investigators and obstructing probes by the inspector general and the Senate panel led by Sen. John McCain, Arizona Republican.

Earlier, the judge dismissed a portion of one count of the indictment. The language said Mr. Safavian lied by telling a GSA ethics officer Abramoff had no business with the GSA and was not seeking to do business with the agency. There was no evidence during the trial that Mr. Safavian ever made such statements to the GSA, U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman said.

The judge left intact the remainder of the count that Mr. Safavian concealed his assistance to Abramoff. According to testimony, Abramoff used his typically aggressive tactics on an old friend, Mr. Safavian, who now faces a lengthy prison term if convicted of covering up his assistance to the influence peddler.

During the trial, Mr. Safavian acknowledged giving advice and some “nonpublic information” to Abramoff and acknowledged some lapses of judgment and memory, while insisting he hadn’t intentionally misled GSA and Senate investigators.

Mr. Safavian, once the chief of staff at the General Services Administration, said he told an FBI agent he had advised Abramoff on two GSA properties in the fall of 2002, rather than — as actually happened — in the weeks before he took a luxury-filled golf trip to Scotland that Abramoff arranged in August 2002.

“I was just mistaken about the time frame,” Mr. Safavian testified last week.

If Mr. Safavian is acquitted, the prosecution’s decision not to put Abramoff on the witness stand would turn out to have been a mistake.

A conviction would follow a trial in which the star witness was not a person, but rather hundreds of e-mails between Abramoff and Mr. Safavian.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide