- The Washington Times - Monday, June 19, 2006


Nathan Bales represents a troubling trend for cell-phone carriers.

The Kansas City-area countertop installer recently traded in a number of feature-laden phones for a stripped-down model. He said he didn’t like using them to surf the Internet, rarely took pictures with them and couldn’t stand scrolling through seemingly endless menus to get the functions to work.

“I want a phone that is tough and easy to use,” said Mr. Bales, 30. “I don’t want to listen to music with it. I’m not a cyber-savvy guy.”

But the wireless industry wants him to be comfortable with advanced features and actively use them. As the universe of people who want a cell phone and don’t already have one gets smaller, wireless carriers are counting on advanced services to generate the bulk of new revenue in coming years.

Consumers last year paid $8.6 billion for so-called data applications on their phones, up 86 percent from the previous year, according to wireless trade group CTIA.

But they’ve also shown a growing frustration with how confusing those added features can be. A J.D. Power and Associates survey last year found consumer satisfaction with their mobile devices has declined since 2003, with some of the largest drops linked to user interface for Internet and e-mail services.

That has providers working hard to make their devices easier to use — fewer steps, brighter and less-cluttered screens, different pricing strategies — so consumers will not only use data functions more often but also be encouraged to buy additional ones.

For Sprint Nextel Corp., the process begins in a suite of small rooms on its operations campus in suburban Kansas City.

On one recent day, a trio of researchers watched through one-way glass and overhead cameras as a volunteer navigated her way through a prototype program that lets parents set limits on their children’s phone use.

The observers monitored how many steps it took for the woman to make the program work, how easily she made mistakes and how quickly she could get herself out of trouble. The results could be used to further tweak the program, said Robert Moritz, director of device development.

“If you bring somebody in and they have problems, it’s not because they’re dumb, but we were dumb with the design,” Mr. Moritz said, adding that the lab typically tests devices and programs with up to 50 users over three to nine months. The company also uses focus groups to determine what people want from their phones and what they say needs fixing.

The results of those studies can sometimes push back the release of a product. For example, Michael Coffey, vice president of Sprint’s user-experience design, said the company delayed releasing its walkie-talkie Ready Link service for about a year after testers said they didn’t like the short delay between when the user pushes the button and the recipient answers.

Mr. Coffey said the testing is worth it because ease-of-use can be a competitive edge.

“IPod was not the first MP3 player on the market, but once they figured it out [the user interface], they became the predominant one overnight,” he said. “Whether you make it a marketing message or not, the public will discover that usability and choose your product over a competitor’s.”

So far, Sprint Nextel is doing something right as its subscribers spend the highest average amount for data services in the industry.

The other major wireless providers use similar techniques to improve their devices and programs.

Cingular Wireless, the nation’s largest wireless provider, developed MEdia Net, which allows users to personalize their phones for using the Internet, downloading ring tones or getting e-mail.

Verizon Wireless has V Cast, a service that makes it easier to download music and video. The company has also pushed designs that allow users to accomplish many things with one-button press.

T-Mobile also has focused on a few key areas, introducing T-Zone to help customers find ring tones and screen wallpaper by subject and decreasing the number of steps to take and send photos, for example.

“Communication and personalization will continue to be the driver for phone use,” said Michael Gallelli, director of product marketing at T-Mobile.

Some analysts pointed to phones from niche providers, such as youth-oriented Amp’d Mobile and sports-centric ESPN Mobile, as good examples of intuitive design, marrying easy-to-understand menus with pared-down lists of content aimed at their particular markets.

But Roger Entner of the market research firm Ovum said none of the major carriers impresses him. He says most of them are trying to replicate how people use personal computers instead of coming up with a new approach.

“What do [customers] do best on the phone? They talk. What do they do worst? Type. Why is every user interface based on typing?” Mr. Entner said. “Right now, the software developers take advantage of every weakness a device has and none of the strengths.”

Some wireless carriers and third-party companies are experimenting with voice-recognition technology.

Kirkland, Wash.-based VoiceBox Technologies, for instance, plans to release a product later this year that recognizes words and context in a customer’s speech to immediately bring them content on their phones.

Charles Golvin of Forrester Research Inc. said a recent survey indicated few cellular customers choose a phone based on its usability, typically because they either don’t think there’s anything better or, like Bales in Kansas City, don’t think they need those services.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide