- The Washington Times - Thursday, June 29, 2006

ASSOCIATED PRESS

The House agreed Wednesday to affirm the right of voters in areas with large populations of non-English-speaking citizens to cast ballots in their native language.

The 254-167 roll call in support of bilingual balloting came just a week after Republican divisions about the issue contributed to the postponement of a House vote to renew the landmark 1965 Voting Rights Act.

“If you have the good fortune to be able to vote in the United States, then it is not too much to ask that this be accomplished in English,” said Rep. Cliff Stearns, Florida Republican, “I don’t think the United States government should be forced to pay for [bilingual] assistance.”

The bilingual balloting vote came on an amendment by Mr. Stearns as the House debated a $59.8 billion measure funding the annual budgets of the departments of Justice, Commerce and State.

An overwhelming majority of Democrats joined with slightly fewer than one-third of House Republicans to reject Mr. Stearns’ amendment.

About 500 political subdivisions in 31 states must offer bilingual assistance. Of those states, five — Alaska, Arizona, California, New Mexico and Texas — must provide the assistance statewide.

The issue has become embroiled with a passionate election-year debate to overhaul immigration laws. Conservative Republicans have pushed to make English the official national language.

Supporters of non-English ballots reminded colleagues that only U.S. citizens are able to vote and that even those whose native language is English have difficulty with complex ballot initiatives, much less those who learned the language after coming to this country.

Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, said taking away the right to bilingual ballots would “allow states and localities to discriminate against taxpaying American citizens because of their language ability and impede their right to vote. That is wrong.”

Also Wednesday, the Justice Department settled a lawsuit with Brazos County, Texas, for denying Spanish-speaking citizens voting materials and ballots in Spanish and preventing them from getting help with voting.

“The Voting Rights Act has nothing to do with immigration,” said Rep. Linda Sanchez, California Democrat. “One hundred percent [of those benefiting from non-English ballots] are U.S. citizens.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide