- The Washington Times - Sunday, June 4, 2006

A failed immigration policy

When the current president’s father turned his “read my lips” tax pledge into a “read my hips” tax increase, then ordered gun-control measures and notoriously resigned his National Rifle Association membership, he ensured his electoral demise as his conservative base abandoned him.

His son risks a similar fate by obstinately sticking to an immigration policy that is clearly not in the national interest (“Bush circles the wagons as approval ratings slip,” Page 1, Saturday). Marriage amendments and conservative judges are good, but cannot compensate for failing to enforce existing immigration law and securing the borders.

One begins to wonder if President Cheney wouldn’t be an improvement.



Whitewashing North Vietnamese crimes

I take umbrage with Georgie Anne Geyer’s remarks about Vietnam in her Commentary piece, “Press under attack” (Thursday). Ms. Geyer claims, “Ironically, in Vietnam, the Geneva Accords were generally observed, not only by the North Vietnamese ‘regulars’ but also by the Viet Cong.” Miss Geyer reflects “There was a Brigadoon time in war coverage, when many sides tried to obey the Geneva Accords. The accords, intended to regularize and civilize warfare, tried to assure that odd people on the battlefield, such as journalists and humanitarian workers, would be considered ‘noncombatants.’ Under this designation, we were, if captured, supposed to be exchanged to our home countries and spared.”

Evidently Miss Geyer was in Jane Fonda’s Vietnam, while I was in the real Vietnam.

I was a civilian working for the U.S. Agency for International Development, a “humanitarian worker.” I was captured by the North Vietnamese during the Tet offensive in January 1968 and held for more than five years; 27 months of which was in solitary confinement, one year in a cage in Cambodia and one year in a black box in Hanoi. Soon after my capture, two American missionaries joined me — a female nurse and a male Bible translator. The male came down with pneumonia, and although they had adequate medicine, when the doctor who diagnosed him was asked what he was prescribing he replied, “Let him die, he is of no value as a hostage.” After the woman and I angered the North Vietnamese Army, our food was poisoned, and she died after three days. Fifty-eight of my fellow USAID colleagues and International Voluntary Service humanitarian workers were killed in Vietnam and those portions of Laos occupied by the NVA. Fifty-five civilians survived capture and were released after five years. I believe the Geneva Convention stipulates they are to be released within weeks after their capture.

Right after my capture, North Vietnamese troops overran a well-known American Christian Missionary compound in the Central Highlands, first blowing up the missionaries’ houses and then setting up headquarters in the church on the compound in violation of the Geneva Convention. Seven American missionaries and two Montagnard pastors were murdered in cold blood. Three tried to surrender with a white flag and hands in the air, calling out in Vietnamese “We surrender! We surrender!” The NVA then coolly walked over to the bunker where the others had sought shelter and tossed in grenades, blowing them to bits. The NVA captured two female schoolteachers in Laos, tied them to poles inside a grass hut and burned them to death.

Miss Geyer must know how captives were really treated by the NVA, since according to her she spent “… years of covering wars and conflicts.” A great many of the POWs released in 1973 from the prisons in Hanoi had been brutally tortured and some who never returned had been murdered in the prisons. It sounds as if Miss Geyer may have fallen victim to propaganda of Jane Fonda (Hanoi Jane), Sen. John Kerry and the communist Vietnamese about that regime’s so-called “humane and lenient treatment.”

On the other hand, if she is comparing the casualties of journalists in Vietnam to those in Iraq, perhaps part of the explanation can be attributed to the fact that there’s no Caravelle bar in the Green Zone in Iraq; therefore, the journalists in Iraq are doing their very dangerous job and getting their stories where the real fighting is. I was with renowned Vietnam journalist Bernard Fall just before he was killed by a mine blast while out on patrol with the Marines, and he was complaining that too many of the “so-called” news articles were being written at the bar at the Caravelle Hotel (where CBS had its Saigon bureau), not out where the battles were. Mr. Fall also suspected, and was later proven right, that communist infiltrators at some of the major wire services were doctoring news reports to paint American troops in a bad light.


Falls Church

Congressional double standards

It appears that under the pressure of combat in a war situation, where some of their friends and comrades have been killed, some of our soldiers and Marines have violated our standards of conduct. Thus, all of our troops in the Iraq area are undergoing refresher training in our core values (“Soldiers cleared in town killings,” Page 1, Saturday).

Judging from the actions of former Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham, California Republican, Rep. William J. Jefferson, Louisiana Democrat, and others, it appears that a larger proportion of our congressmen are violators of our standards of conduct than our servicemen. These congressmen have violated our standards, not in the heat of battle in a war zone, but deliberately, with much planning and thought, for personal greed to serve themselves. Thus, it would seem helpful that after the Department of Defense has finished training our servicemen in Iraq on our core values they should also train our congressmen in those same values.


Chantilly, Va.

Illegal aliens:the real story

I would like to congratulate Deborah Simmons for her clarity and forcefulness in helping to tell the story of illegal aliens as it is, and as most Americans, I believe, see it (“Keep America American, Op-Ed, Friday).

I only wish our senators and representatives would acknowledge the facts as she states them. Or, at a minimum, perhaps they could read the column to give them some on-target factors to insert into this significant immigration debate.

Thanks for getting out a lucid message.



The rockfish situation

Gene Mueller’s courageous double-barreled column, “With rockfish, will history repeat?” (Weekend Athlete, yesterday) was right on the mark in two closely related areas, namely the deteriorating health of this important fish due to the commercial overfishing of its principal food source (menhaden), and the overharvesting of the larger members of the rockfish species.

The cap that was placed on the numbers of menhaden allowed for industrial harvest was much too little, too late, and the tonnage of this important baitfish (and water filtering fish) being removed from the waters of the Bay are too great to sustain either one of the two. I applaud Mr. Mueller’s accurate and frank treatment of both these problems in spite of the fact that it will no doubt stir up the usual assault from the commercial interests and lobbyists.


Mechanicsville, Md.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide