- The Washington Times - Tuesday, March 21, 2006

NEW YORK — The U.N. Security Council postponed a meeting yesterday on Iran’s nuclear program as the West searched for new ways to break a deadlock with Russia and China over the best way to pressure Tehran, diplomats said.

The decision came after senior diplomats from the five veto-wielding members of the council and Germany made little headway on bridging their differences during a 4-hour meeting Monday evening. Diplomats said Russia was the main holdout with China following.

That deadlock has forced Britain, France and Germany — the European troika leading negotiations on Iran — to reopen the text of a statement that would be the first Security Council response. Diplomats will focus on bilateral talks to try to find an agreement, they said yesterday.

“We’ll just keep working on it,” U.S. Ambassador John R. Bolton said.

The United States and its European allies want a statement reiterating demands by the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), that Iran suspend uranium enrichment, the process that can be used to generate nuclear power or make nuclear weapons.

Diplomats said the Russians and Chinese have not budged from their opposition to tough language, including a demand for a report in 14 days on Iran’s compliance with the IAEA demands. Moscow and Beijing have said that is not enough time, with China suggesting 30 to 45 days.

Russia and China also want the IAEA to keep the main role in cajoling Iran on uranium enrichment. They have raised concerns that pushing Iran too hard could lead to its withdrawal from the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty and expulsion of IAEA inspectors.

“From the beginning, I proposed that if the Security Council is to support IAEA, it is to have a brief political statement and support the IAEA, call on the Iranians to cooperate and then I think put some pressure” on them, China’s U.N. ambassador Wang Guangya, said.

Monday night’s high-level meeting, hosted by British Foreign Office Political Director John Sawers, occurred hours after a letter came to light detailing secret British proposals to offer Iran a new package of incentives to comply with the IAEA.

The confidential March 16 letter from Mr. Sawers to his counterparts in the United States, France and at the European Union suggested that offering the incentives might make Russia and China more willing to accept sanctions later on if Iran doesn’t comply.

The letter, obtained by the Associated Press, says that the Western allies “are not going to bring the Russians and the Chinese to accept significant sanctions over the coming months, certainly not without further efforts to bring the Iranians around.”

That proposal appeared to have had no immediate visible effect on the Russian and Chinese stance.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide