- The Washington Times - Sunday, November 12, 2006

BALTIMORE (AP) — There was a time when the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops often pronounced on the nation’s political issues. In the 1970s, the bishops led the fight against abortion after Roe v. Wade. During the Cold War, they questioned the morality of nuclear deterrence.

But the bishops now face a different world — one where their moral authority has been diminished by the clergy sex abuse crisis, where money for church programs is scarce and where many American Catholics have little understanding of, or regard for, church teaching.

At a national meeting starting today in Baltimore, the bishops are expected to make changes that adjust to their new circumstances. They will channel resources away from broad social pronouncements and focus more on defining Catholicism for an often uninvolved flock.

“It’s not that the bishops as a national organization will no longer be interested in sociopolitical issues,” said Russell Shaw, a writer on Roman Catholic issues who spent more than 15 years as a spokesman for the conference. “But the emphasis is shifting to the life of the church itself and its own internal problems.”

The new focus is clear from the agenda for this week’s gathering.

The bishops will vote on documents explaining the church’s ban on artificial contraception and worthiness for receiving Holy Communion. The prelates also will consider new guidelines on ministry to homosexual Catholics, which explain the theological underpinnings of church teaching that marriage means one man and one woman.

In addition, the bishops will take up a proposed restructuring of the conference’s Washington headquarters to reflect their new priorities. Under the plan, American dioceses would send less money to the conference, which in turn would cut jobs and committees.

For many Catholics, the changes are long overdue. Bishops have complained for years that the funds they turn over for conference work are badly needed in their home dioceses. Others consider the large staff unnecessary, a hangover from the conference’s heyday in the early 1980s, when revered Chicago Cardinal Joseph Bernardin was guiding its work and the prelates undertook such ambitious projects as the pastoral letter on nuclear weapons called “The Challenge of Peace.”

“Some of the younger bishops are less formed by the bureaucracy and are more suspicious of it, and more likely to want to have more direct ways of responding to crises,” said Helen Hull Hitchcock, director of Women for Faith & Family, a conservative Catholic groups.

But critics see the turn inward as disturbing. The Rev. Thomas Reese, former editor of the Jesuit magazine America, noted that the agenda included no mention of the war in Iraq, although bishops still could raise the topic from the floor.

“It’s the most important moral issue facing the country, and in the past the bishops would have said something about it,” Father Reese said.

The proposed changes partly reflect changes in the church hierarchy.

Older bishops who experienced the modernizing reforms of the Second Vatican Council have been retiring in significant numbers. They have been succeeded by appointees of Pope John Paul II who have taken up the late pontiff’s defense of Catholic orthodoxy.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide