- The Washington Times - Wednesday, October 18, 2006

Last week we considered the impractical notion that a first-time home buyer can receive accurate rate and closing-cost quotes without giving the lender any information about the purchase or down payment. The bottom line is that a first-time home buyer needs to provide some details to the loan officer in order to receive an accurate quote.

This week, I would like to illustrate the importance of consulting with a competent loan officer before house hunting begins. Here’s a description of a conversation I had this week.

A young man was referred to me by his real estate agent. He says he needs to be pre-approved for a mortgage and is planning on going out this Sunday to look at houses. I ask him a few questions and learn that he’s married, has $110,000 in combined annual income, $65,000 in the bank and a $400 monthly car loan payment.

With this information, I certainly can qualify him and his wife for a particular mortgage amount, but I don’t do it that way. If you have good credit, you can find a lender that will lend you almost any amount of money. Borrowing an amount of money just because you “qualify” in the lender’s eyes is the wrong approach.

Therefore, I ask this fellow a few more questions. I learn that he and his wife are renting an apartment for $1,100 per month. I ask him if they have discussed a “comfort level” for a total house payment. He tells me they are hoping to keep their payment below $2,500 per month. He then tells me that he’s going to be visiting houses in the $500,000 range.

I know immediately that this scenario might be tough. I run the numbers to determine the traditional “qualifying ratios” used by most lenders. I multiply their combined monthly income of $9,167 by 38 percent and get $3,483. Lenders use the 38 percent guideline as the maximum amount for total house payment and other monthly obligations, including car loans and credit card payments.

I then subtract the $400 car payment and get $3,083. This is the maximum amount that most lenders would consider to be a reasonable house payment based on their circumstances.

I tell the young man that his goal of keeping the payment under $2,500 is well under traditional guidelines. This is a good thing, but can he purchase a $500,000 house and keep the payment to $2,500? Let’s find out.

Because they have $65,000 in the bank, I create a scenario using a 10 percent down payment. A 90 percent loan would require private mortgage insurance, so we have to break the borrowed money in to two loans, called an 80-10-10 scenario. An 80 percent loan on a $500,000 purchase results in a first-trust loan of $400,000. Using a market rate of 6 percent for a 30-year fixed-rate loan, I see the principal and interest (P&I;) payment is $2,398 per month.

The remaining 10 percent ($50,000) to be financed will carry a rate of about 7 percent, resulting in a P&I; payment of $332 per month.

Add estimated taxes and insurance of $400, and we have a total payment of $3,130.

I tell my borrower that he can certainly afford a $500,000 house in the eyes of most lenders, but the monthly payment will be far more than the $2,500 comfort level he and his wife have set. They can’t have their cake and eat it, too. They have to give up something.

I then calculate a purchase price based upon their $2,500 comfort level and give him the unfortunate news that he and his wife would have to lower their purchase-price range to about $400,000.

The disappointment is evident over the telephone, so I suggest a few options. First, I explain the tax advantages of homeownership versus renting. I explain that nearly $30,000 of their annual interest and tax expense will be deductible. This is $20,000 more than the $10,000 allowable standard deduction. The $20,000 equates to roughly $6,000 in tax savings, effectively freeing up $500 per month.

Bingo. Assuming that no major changes enter their financial picture, this couple can collectively withhold $500 less from their combined paychecks and apply it to a larger mortgage payment without being in danger of underwithholding and facing a big tax bill in April.

I advise my borrower that I am not a tax adviser and he should speak with one in order to fine-tune the numbers I have given him.

I then explain to him that there other options. The oft-demonized “interest-only” loans will enable the couple to borrow roughly 18 percent more with the same payment. I explain that an interest-only loan is available with a fixed interest rate, eliminating any possible increases. I also explain that an interest-only loan does not require an interest-only payment. Principal curtailment can be made at any time, and interest-only loans are perfectly acceptable programs for those folks who are financially responsible.

In the end, my borrower was armed with scenarios with a purchase price range between $400,000 and $500,000. As he and his wife visit homes this Sunday, they will have a reasonably accurate picture of what each house will cost them.

House hunting without this knowledge is a waste of time. Consult a competent loan officer and educate yourself before the house hunt.

Henry Savage is president of PMC Mortgage in Alexandria. Reach him by e-mail ([email protected]pmcmortgage.com).

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More

Click to Hide